11–15 of 15 posts
Next they will commission a report concluding that door locks hinder no-knock searches.
http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7047196-Video-Doorbel...
http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7047194-LES-FBI-Techn...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I always wondered why Tony Soprano didn’t have surveillance cameras everywhere. His most clever opsec was “stand by this loud machine when talking“.
So you have cameras on your house. Are you watching them 24/7? No, otherwise you wouldn't be able to do anything else. Systems like Ring and even the software for full camera systems can notify you when they detect something. Great, too late as the coppers are already beating on the door. I'm not sure how effect that is.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you have cameras on your house. Are you watching them 24/7? No, otherwise you wouldn't be able to do anything else. Systems like Ring and even the software for full camera systems can notify you when they detect something. Great, too late as the coppers are already beating on the door. I'm not sure how effect that is.
I mean if you have large sums of money it would be worth it to hire someone to watch cameras, right? Isn't that what security guards do?
I suspect Ring and other doorbell cameras are making the job of the police far easier on the whole than the little "inconvenience" mentioned in this article.
With the access police departments have to ring door bells I'm sure they can remotely turn them off or prevent them from alarming the owners. /s These things are a privacy nightmare. I'm glad I live in a country where private surveillance of the public is illegal.
Are you allowed to take photos in a public area? What about video?
How do they differentiate between that and a camera mounted to your house?
So you can't have security cameras unless they only point at your own property?