Live data from Hacker News

Blanked-out spots on China's maps helped us uncover Xinjiang's camps

buzzfeednews.com

11–20 of 316 posts

Re: Blanked-out spots on China's maps helped us uncover Xinjiang's camps

#12
post #3

There are blank spots on western maps too, I can think of at least one [1] that isn't in Google maps. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviano_Air_Base

Not true -- https://www.google.com/maps/place/Aviano+Air+Base/@46.033364...

Ok, it has changed, it was just a blank space when I was driving around there in 2016.

Re: Blanked-out spots on China's maps helped us uncover Xinjiang's camps

#14
post #3

There are blank spots on western maps too, I can think of at least one [1] that isn't in Google maps. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviano_Air_Base

Wikipedia has a list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_satellite_map_images_w...

Re: Blanked-out spots on China's maps helped us uncover Xinjiang's camps

#15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not true -- https://www.google.com/maps/place/Aviano+Air+Base/@46.033364...

Try this one, I just noticed it while on vacation nearby: https://maps.app.goo.gl/ccm3ZcQ771mb6Jtj8 Edit sorry I can't link to satellite view from mobile. It's the Mola Fortress on Menorca.

In France, many military and nuclear facilities are also smoothed out in google maps. It seems a bit ridiculous since you can easily see public (free and paid) satellite images of the same places.

Re: Blanked-out spots on China's maps helped us uncover Xinjiang's camps

#19
post #8

Speaking of maps, I've always wondered what's in that huge, mostly-unlabeled region that is more than half of Russia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geography_of_Russia It looks like it could comfortably fit a few countries and then some. Even when watching history documentaries there's a period where Russia is basically a thin strip at the western edge of its current territory, before suddenly and inexplicably blowin…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiga

Re: Blanked-out spots on China's maps helped us uncover Xinjiang's camps

#20
post #11

The story seems to counter the popular view that BuzzFeed is low brow, low effort journalism. Did they have some kind of campaign to get better?

Buzzfeed does a lot of fluff ("You won't believe these 87 talking cats") plus decent, fairly well-regarded journalism (paid for by the fluff). This actually isn't that different to how normal papers operate; sports, gossip (called 'society' if the paper is sufficiently fancy) etc, bring in the money, with investigative journalism not exactly being a big earner. The difference is that Buzzfeed had the fluff before it did journalism.

Due to the travails of the news industry, there are currently a lot of good journalists and not a lot of jobs for them, so this sort of non-traditional route works. Teen Vogue is another example, arguably, though a less dramatic one; surprisingly good journalism in an outlet where you wouldn't traditionally expect journalism at all.

Post reply on HN