Patrick Collison's Questions

It's simply impossible to detach Japan from their culture.

The main thing that stands out to me is their selflessness.

One anectdata: Tokyo feels pretty much the opposite of NYC. In NYC it feels like people are obstacles to avoid on the way to where you are going. Nobody waits for anybody. At first it seems rude, then you realize "it's not personal" and just assume the same stance. It's ok to quickly walk in front of someone who's not paying attention, it's ok to not say hi and just quickly ask what they want. You end up thinking a city that big and with so many people can only be that way. Then you go to Japan and are completely blown away. Everybody is aware of everyone else on the street, even if it's packed people will give you the right of way, they'll wait for you if you are distracted, they'll stop and try to help you if you seem lost, and seemingly everywhere people will be super polite. To me the difference is that in NY (and maybe the US in general), I'm always first and most important, whereas in Tokyo (and probably Japan in general), everyone is more important than just myself.

Two small stories about Japan: 1) a friend was trying to find a place to exchange some USD and got a bit lost, he asked a random person about it, this person walked my friend for 3 blocks to the currency exchange shop. 2) when going through a bus station in Tokyo, one of the escalators was closed for cleaning, when I walked by, the janitor was laying down flat on the floor, holding a special brush, meticulously cleaning the yellow metal mat at the entrance of the escalator, completely absorbed in what he was doing. I've never seen anyone, anywhere else in the world, put so much care into cleaning a public space.

My understanding is that NSF doesn't want PI salaries to be dependent upon grants -- that way, your job isn't (directly) on the line for a specific line of research. It removes at least a little bit of bias toward proposing research just to stay funded.

Moreover, the policy is an incentive for universities to hire faculty, which is generally good for research/teaching.

The hard thing, from the university's perspective, is that a faculty hire is, assuming tenure, very expensive. There is generally a ~$0.5-1M laboratory-startup package, plus a commitment of a professor's salary until ~2055. For this reason, our Department is generally allotted ~1 faculty hire/year. Only exceptional events, like the appearance of a huge and sustained source of money or winning the Nobel Prize (UW Physics: 1989 and 2016) will permit extra hires in targeted fields.

Furthermore, because faculty hires are so rare and each professor gets a vote, each hire has an impact on internal politics. Our department is comparatively friendly, but faculty-hire slots are the most precious commodity in any department.

All of this is to say that it is difficult to find a path that, in this case, would help to retain knowledge and talent in our group. The meeting of the minds that needs to happen is between national funding policy and the status quo among most universities. It is so far above my pay-grade that I've not yet found a reasonable angle from which to attempt to solve the problem.

Do you have a source for that? 11 deaths seems like it would be shockingly high for a modern project.

Einstein was not a conformist. Could he have survived such an environment? Or would they beat him down, or would he leave?

Consider Li Wenliang, who first noticed covid19, and was interviewed by the police, and investigated after his death for disrupting public order.

OTOH the PRC have been very astute in adopting capitalism. If they can, they will find a way for research. I'm just not sure if it's possible to reconcile thought-control in one sphere, and not in another.