Live data from Hacker News

Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

github.com

111–120 of 173 posts

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#111
I’ve jokingly / seriously been waiting for things like this. I’m the type to go overboard with filtering and mute lists on twitter, but images are harder to deal with. I did have a 60,000 line pastebin that was used in conjunction with a Chrome extension to block Wojack and Pepe memes on 4chan using md5 hashes, but something not rely on specific hashes is obviously superior.

One day someone will release the ‘detect and block anything resembling kpop’ extension for Twitter and I’ll be happy.

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#112
post #99
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's like saying you are always nude under your clothes so nudity isn't a problem. Nudity in movies is like softcore porn and they often come with bed scenes. Of course if your family is just you and your wife it's fine but I don't think any sane person would consider that ok for kids.

Why not? I’d definitely be more ok with a soft core scene than some brutal violence. Sex is normal/good part of life. One should educate kids about sex (and when it is appropriate) rather than pretend it literally doesn’t exist.

I would say keep kids away from both. Sex isn't something that needs to be taught, your kids will figure it out when they are ready and old enough.

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#114

Anyone know of a tool which can process videos (movies) and black/blur out nude scenes and make the film "family friendly"? The processing doesn't have to be realtime... Just to expand: there are many excellent films which are not "family friendly" only because of 1 or 2 nude scenes which aren't even germane to the overall plot in many cases. I often wished there was a tool or SaaS that could detect such scenes and c…

[deleted]

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#115
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Luckily in Europe, that is hardly an issue as most countries are quite alright with their bodies and sexualities.

I'm curious: how would you boss react to such an image appearing on your monitor? Is this considered "OK" in a European workplace?

[deleted]

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#116
Now just make a version that whites-out NSFW text in e-books and market it to Utahns as a way to read PG-13 versions of Game of Thrones books and you'll be rich.

However, you'll probably also be sued into oblivion by angry authors/publishers who don't like people modifying what they read in any way.

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#117
post #116

Now just make a version that whites-out NSFW text in e-books and market it to Utahns as a way to read PG-13 versions of Game of Thrones books and you'll be rich. However, you'll probably also be sued into oblivion by angry authors/publishers who don't like people modifying what they read in any way.

I know that’s tongue in cheek, but I’d really appreciate having a NSFW text filter.

Some of my CX team is getting harassed by trolls who send profane messages and racial slurs through the Zendesk Chat interface. Zendesk does not have a way to filter out profanity (for Chat at least; there are options for emails or tickets).

I’ve found simple client side extensions that can censor words, but a better approach would use NLP to grasp the context.

“I hope you die” contains the same words as “My got wet, I hope it didn’t die”, but with vastly different intention.

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#118
post #49

I happen to not be afraid of boobs, so ever since my days on Reddit I wish for blocking of random gore instead. This is weirdly pertinent sometimes on DDG's image search. Edit: to clarify, I'm not afraid of some killing either, thanks to the pop culture of the past seventy years or so. Now, why eye-hurting images of bodily damage pop up on rather innocent searches—that's a haunting mystery. On Reddit, the ‘NSFW’ labe…

I have never understood how acts of love (at best) or reproduction (at the least) are considered in some societies to be dangerous, shocking, and in need of the strictest censorship -- or at the very least, not on prime-time TV. Yet acts of war, killing, maiming, and violence in general are often the mainstay of entertainment. Sex is part of human nature – and, I would argue, a much bigger and better part of it than…

Sex is complicated. Sex is not always a beautiful expression of love between committed partners. Sometimes it's a casual pursuit of pleasure. Sometimes it's a whimsical act of exploration.

In many cases sex is the direct cause of much sorrow, misery, and emotional damage. Maybe your partner cheated on you. Maybe you got pregnant and your partner left. Maybe alcohol was involved. Maybe you are lonely and got addicted to pornography. Maybe you didn't use contraceptives and are now seeking (or went and got) an abortion. If you look around in poor communities, you'll find a big source of poverty is... unprotected sex. It turns out, you can pretty much ruin your life as a teenager and guarantee you'll stay in poverty your whole life if you get pregnant and have a baby while you are in middle school/high school.

Unlike war and murder, sex is something most people will participate in (in some form or another). So I would argue that it's more important than ever to consider the types of sexual messages we send in media. Do we want to promote sexual relationships between committed partners or do we want to promote wanton promiscuity? I would argue that whichever you choose will have an impact on some non-negligible % of the future choices of the viewers. To be clear, I think we also need to be careful of depictions of extreme gore/violence as well, but for slightly different reasons.

In general, I'm of the opinion that implicit > explicit for both sex and violence in media, but perhaps there is a time/place for being explicit (i.e. so people understand what really happened during the Holocaust, etc).

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#119

If you want to make videos family friendly, it's probably better to aim for removing violence than nudity, as one is clearly worse for the psych than the other. Expansion: how are nude scenes not family friendly? Not trying to start any flame wars here, just trying to understand how one or two scenes with nudity suddenly means the video is not family friendly? We all go through life seeing nudity, so should be fine.…

Because it's awkward getting sexually aroused in front of family members?

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#120

Anyone know of a tool which can process videos (movies) and black/blur out nude scenes and make the film "family friendly"? The processing doesn't have to be realtime... Just to expand: there are many excellent films which are not "family friendly" only because of 1 or 2 nude scenes which aren't even germane to the overall plot in many cases. I often wished there was a tool or SaaS that could detect such scenes and c…

There is a company that was trying to work in this space called VidAngel. https://www.vidangel.com/ I used to use them quite a lot and then they got sued by everyone and now I’m not sure what they are up too. It’s unclear if a company has the right to offer others content in a modified form - ie filtering out unacceptable content. My favorite thing is that they had a JarJar filter for the Star Wars prequels.

Yeah, VidAngel is pretty much non-usable now because of the lawsuit(s)
Post reply on HN