Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

github.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

101–110 of 173 posts

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#101

Post by hvdijk »

yepguy wrote: post #62
hvdijk wrote: post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are conflating nudity and porn when they are two different things, and as far as nudity is concerned, focusing only on whether it is okay according to Christianity to be naked, rather than the other question more relevant to this story, which is whether it is okay according to Christianity to see someone else (who may or may not be Christian themself) be naked.

No, I didn't conflate anything. My post specifically covered that pornography is banned, while nudity may be permissible if it does not offend modesty.

The question you responded to was:

> Most of religions forbid people to be naked / see other people naked? Please, list some of them, as I'm having a hard time finding which ones do this.

You decided to respond with a point about pornography. Either you conflated nudity and pornography, or you responded with something unrelated to the question. I assumed the former as that seemed to me to be the more charitable explanation, but if the latter was the case instead, I apologise for the incorrect assumption. Instead, let me ask you: why did you feel it relevant to bring up pornography in response to that question?

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#102

Post by esperent »

yonixw wrote: post #95
m3kw9 wrote: post #92

From experience 99.9% of the time unless I visit a porn site purposely or some warez site by accident, or questionable reddit channels, I see no NSFW. However I do see some benefits if this was for kids.

Sound like you have ad-block or avoid sketchy (pirate) websites.

Adblock is a far simpler and probably more effective solution than this, with a host of other benefits such as speeding up websites, whereass presumably this extension will slow down the browsing experience quite a bit. Given that, the only reason I can see for using this is if adblock was not doing a good enough job alone.

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#103

Post by mensetmanusman »

rimliu wrote: post #89
jpxw wrote: post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People want to avoid the porn industry because it’s sleazy, predatory, and reduces sex to a commodity.

And murder is ok?

Porn is to murder as romance is to self-defence.

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#104

Post by dc_count »

tantalor wrote: post #98
dc_count wrote: post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Use netron to visualize model: https://lutzroeder.github.io/netron/?url=https://raw.githubu...

> Wait, it's all a DAG? >> Always has been.

The brain is a heavily cyclic graph. We're not there yet ;)

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#105

Post by halflings »

dc_count wrote: post #93
_f9cu wrote: post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Something to visualise the models, the one in this link https://github.com/nsfw-filter/nsfw-filter/tree/master/dist/...

Use netron to visualize model: https://lutzroeder.github.io/netron/?url=https://raw.githubu...

This is amazing. Thanks for sharing! Didn't know about netron.

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#106

Post by yepguy »

hvdijk wrote: post #101
yepguy wrote: post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, I didn't conflate anything. My post specifically covered that pornography is banned, while nudity may be permissible if it does not offend modesty.

The question you responded to was: > Most of religions forbid people to be naked / see other people naked? Please, list some of them, as I'm having a hard time finding which ones do this. You decided to respond with a point about pornography. Either you conflated nudity and pornography, or you responded with something unrelated to the question. I assumed the former as that seemed to me to be the more charitable expla…

For all practical purposes, Catholicism is an example of a religion that forbids nudity. Depictions of nudity that the church would find acceptable, online or in popular media, are rare enough that a concerned Catholic would be justified in avoiding all nudity out of caution.

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#108

Post by kube-system »

dirtnugget wrote: post #79
goda90 wrote: post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lots of nudity in film is of a sexual nature. Uncontrolled exposure to fictional depictions of sex could create unhealthy understanding of sex in children that parents want to avoid. Hence not family friendly. I'm not saying most in film violence is either, but that's the reason. One film I think of in this regard is Schindler's List. I've seen both the original and the TV edit that Spielberg made to broadcast for te…

I would generally put Schindlers List onto the "not-so-family-friendly"-list. It’s educational I guess but I wouldn’t want to show it to anyone below 16. And after that the nudity should be fine.

FWIW, my local secondary school here in the US has no issues showing Schindlers List to students in class. But this attitude isn’t something that would extend to a movie with nudity of a sexual or casual nature.

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#109

Post by pmachinery »

hvdijk wrote: post #101
yepguy wrote: post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, I didn't conflate anything. My post specifically covered that pornography is banned, while nudity may be permissible if it does not offend modesty.

The question you responded to was: > Most of religions forbid people to be naked / see other people naked? Please, list some of them, as I'm having a hard time finding which ones do this. You decided to respond with a point about pornography. Either you conflated nudity and pornography, or you responded with something unrelated to the question. I assumed the former as that seemed to me to be the more charitable expla…

The bulk of his reply was not about pornography. He specifically stated the Catholic Church has no outright ban on nudity, but quoted two paragraphs from the Vatican about "resist[ing] the allurements" of "voyeuristic explorations of the human body" in advertising or other media that "go too far in the exhibition of intimate things".

If advertising material qualifies, nudity in films qualifies.

Re: Chrome, Firefox extension that blocks NSFW images using TensorFlow JS

#110

Post by rtz12 »

pledg wrote: post #10

This would be too late in my workplace, as they'd be logged that I downloaded the images. That I didn't see them in my browser would be irrelevant.

It would be a nice feature for this extention to collect the URLs of detected porn images and report their hashes back, so they could be integrated into the extention itself.
Post reply on HN