71–80 of 173 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Surely it's not that hard to understand that for religious, cultural or other reasons some people and/or members of their family may feel uncomfortable seeing nudity.
Yeah, as far as I know, no religions or cultures forbid people to be naked or see other naked people. What other reasons are you referring to here? It is indeed hard for me to understand how someone can feel uncomfortable seeing nudity, as it's everywhere in life and always has been.
This was one of the stated reasons why we couldn't watch TV or movies that weren't strictly vetted first.
I happen to not be afraid of boobs, so ever since my days on Reddit I wish for blocking of random gore instead. This is weirdly pertinent sometimes on DDG's image search. Edit: to clarify, I'm not afraid of some killing either, thanks to the pop culture of the past seventy years or so. Now, why eye-hurting images of bodily damage pop up on rather innocent searches—that's a haunting mystery. On Reddit, the ‘NSFW’ labe…
I have never understood how acts of love (at best) or reproduction (at the least) are considered in some societies to be dangerous, shocking, and in need of the strictest censorship -- or at the very least, not on prime-time TV. Yet acts of war, killing, maiming, and violence in general are often the mainstay of entertainment. Sex is part of human nature – and, I would argue, a much bigger and better part of it than…
Many people say they are negatively affected by porn addiction (whether consumers, or partners of consumers, or parents, or people who feel objectified, even some people in the industry), and they feel strongly about it. Just because sex is a good part of human nature doesn't invalidate that in their eyes. In fact, it is precisely because some consider sex to be good and precious that they want to be much more careful about viewing it or depicting it, and I agree with that.
The number of societies that don't want censored sexuality is near zero. It is not just "some societies". And there are plenty of societies that desire that more than western ones.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
See also American TV where you can show pretty extreme violence but not swear.
Gore-filled cartoons censoring/hiding the female nipple always gets me.
The demo screenshot/page seems to only show NSFW images, so the demo doesn't convey how quickly this classifier can operate. The demo page should have some non-NSFW images to show off how quickly SFW images are revealed, since the default is to block all images.
If you want to make videos family friendly, it's probably better to aim for removing violence than nudity, as one is clearly worse for the psych than the other. Expansion: how are nude scenes not family friendly? Not trying to start any flame wars here, just trying to understand how one or two scenes with nudity suddenly means the video is not family friendly? We all go through life seeing nudity, so should be fine.…
Lots of nudity in film is of a sexual nature. Uncontrolled exposure to fictional depictions of sex could create unhealthy understanding of sex in children that parents want to avoid. Hence not family friendly. I'm not saying most in film violence is either, but that's the reason. One film I think of in this regard is Schindler's List. I've seen both the original and the TV edit that Spielberg made to broadcast for te…
Sometimes parents consider vaccinations to be out of bounds for their kids, too.
Shameless plug - I've been working on something similiar, but with a different aim. https://github.com/nmurray1984/porn-blocker-chrome-extension I found that the hardest problem to solve was the prevanlence of false positives. Even if you have a low false positive rate, it's still very likely to have an image blocked regularly just due to volume. For that reason, the focus of my plugin is - for users that are OK with…
Once an image tested positive with your first model, you could run a second more CPU intensive model (but also more accurate) on it.
If you want to make videos family friendly, it's probably better to aim for removing violence than nudity, as one is clearly worse for the psych than the other. Expansion: how are nude scenes not family friendly? Not trying to start any flame wars here, just trying to understand how one or two scenes with nudity suddenly means the video is not family friendly? We all go through life seeing nudity, so should be fine.…
Lots of nudity in film is of a sexual nature. Uncontrolled exposure to fictional depictions of sex could create unhealthy understanding of sex in children that parents want to avoid. Hence not family friendly. I'm not saying most in film violence is either, but that's the reason. One film I think of in this regard is Schindler's List. I've seen both the original and the TV edit that Spielberg made to broadcast for te…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
In the USA having something like that on your monitor could be considered sexual harassment if someone else could see it.
I've heard a lot of times about the "American puritanism" but this blows my mind. Is it true that male teachers can't put their hand in their pockets because they could touch their penis or something like that?