Live data from Hacker News

The French Army Is Building Renaissance-Style Fortresses in Africa

thedrive.com

11–20 of 75 posts

Re: The French Army Is Building Renaissance-Style Fortresses in Africa

#13
post #2

Similar concept, lot more stars: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Bourtange

Actually not similar, only the shape is similar. The trick with the "trace italienne" is that each tower (edge of the star) can reach and attack people below the other towers, so each tower is protected by its neighbors.

As far as I can tell, Fort Bourtange never had towers for defense but rather relied on it's walls to protect it enough.

Re: The French Army Is Building Renaissance-Style Fortresses in Africa

#14
Saint Barbara is entirely appropriate for a sapper[1] regiment, but it's disappointing their motto is "Sapeur suis, para demeure" instead of "Bâtis ou crève" ...

    Nous croyions nous aimer pour la vie
    Mais hélas les beaux jours sont si courts
[1] would their work be considered uncivil engineering?

Re: The French Army Is Building Renaissance-Style Fortresses in Africa

#15
post #12

On the same vein, US embassy in Tunis is closer to a fortification than to a diplomatic building. It even has a turret. It seems that other US embassies around the world became fortifications after 2001.

Diplomatic buildings have often been strong points designed to keep staff safe in uncertain times. This is true even in safer locations; the new US embassy in London is very much a fort although the defensive features (like the water-filled moat/pond, and bollards hidden in the hedges) are well integrated into the landscaping.

The new site is probably considerably harder to assault than their old building, even though that looked more like a military building. The Grovesnor Square building was so ugly that even the official picture on the US Embassy website tries to hide it from view behind some trees!

https://uk.usembassy.gov/our-relationship/policy-history/rcg...

Re: The French Army Is Building Renaissance-Style Fortresses in Africa

#19
post #12

On the same vein, US embassy in Tunis is closer to a fortification than to a diplomatic building. It even has a turret. It seems that other US embassies around the world became fortifications after 2001.

Diplomatic buildings have often been strong points designed to keep staff safe in uncertain times. This is true even in safer locations; the new US embassy in London is very much a fort although the defensive features (like the water-filled moat/pond, and bollards hidden in the hedges) are well integrated into the landscaping. The new site is probably considerably harder to assault than their old building, even thoug…

Some people are unable to recognize great architecture when they see it. Saarinen's building is applauded as one of the finest modernist structures in Britain and is rightly Grade II listed.

https://www.economist.com/prospero/2017/09/26/the-american-e...

Post reply on HN