Live data from Hacker News

WireGuard support in Mikrotik RouterOS v7.1beta2

forum.mikrotik.com

21–30 of 79 posts

Re: WireGuard support in Mikrotik RouterOS v7.1beta2

#21
post #2

That was actually really fast considering how long wireguard has(n't) been around. We don't even have it in stable Linux distributions yet. I guess there is some significant demand for it from Mikrotik's customers. I'll probably use it.

There are lots of stable Linux distros running the stable kernel which is 5.8. it is just distros like RHEL that call themselves stable, but are actually antiquated and honestly just give users a bad experience because most of the software is outdated. Wouldn't expect anything less from IBM.

And it's somewhat silly to freeze the kernel. The Linux kernel is meticulous about backwards compatibility. Spin up any distribution user space in docker, and watch it work.

Re: WireGuard support in Mikrotik RouterOS v7.1beta2

#22

The ball's in your court, Ubiquiti

Not ubiquiti's doing but this repo has pre-built kernel modules of wireguard and vyatta integration for I think most of the edgerouter series: https://github.com/WireGuard/wireguard-vyatta-ubnt

I haven't updated/tested in awhile but last I remember I was seeing 800+ mbit/s on my dinky mips ER-X. Pretty amazing and easy to use.

Re: WireGuard support in Mikrotik RouterOS v7.1beta2

#23
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are lots of stable Linux distros running the stable kernel which is 5.8. it is just distros like RHEL that call themselves stable, but are actually antiquated and honestly just give users a bad experience because most of the software is outdated. Wouldn't expect anything less from IBM.

And it's somewhat silly to freeze the kernel. The Linux kernel is meticulous about backwards compatibility. Spin up any distribution user space in docker, and watch it work.

Freezing the RH kernel is mostly to keep closed source kernel modules working. Some proprietary software has those, unfortunately.

Re: WireGuard support in Mikrotik RouterOS v7.1beta2

#24
post #2

That was actually really fast considering how long wireguard has(n't) been around. We don't even have it in stable Linux distributions yet. I guess there is some significant demand for it from Mikrotik's customers. I'll probably use it.

There are lots of stable Linux distros running the stable kernel which is 5.8. it is just distros like RHEL that call themselves stable, but are actually antiquated and honestly just give users a bad experience because most of the software is outdated. Wouldn't expect anything less from IBM.

[deleted]

Re: WireGuard support in Mikrotik RouterOS v7.1beta2

#28
post #25

The ball's in your court, Ubiquiti

It's not. Why would one want that workload on their router when they can offload it to a $35 Pi?

I understand that amateurs love the Pi and other underpowered, junk hardware, but not everybody wants yet another science project in their life.

Re: WireGuard support in Mikrotik RouterOS v7.1beta2

#29
post #22

The ball's in your court, Ubiquiti

Not ubiquiti's doing but this repo has pre-built kernel modules of wireguard and vyatta integration for I think most of the edgerouter series: https://github.com/WireGuard/wireguard-vyatta-ubnt I haven't updated/tested in awhile but last I remember I was seeing 800+ mbit/s on my dinky mips ER-X. Pretty amazing and easy to use.

We built an Ansible role to install and configure Wireguard on EdgeOS. It works well on EdgeRouter Infinity ER-8-XG and EdgeRouter X.

https://github.com/dynamist/ansible-role-wireguard-vyatta

Re: WireGuard support in Mikrotik RouterOS v7.1beta2

#30
post #25

The ball's in your court, Ubiquiti

It's not. Why would one want that workload on their router when they can offload it to a $35 Pi?

One of the main selling points of Wireguard is that it runs much leaner than OpenVPN or IPSec tunnels, especially on embedded hardware, so there isn’t much of a workload in the first place.
Post reply on HN