Live data from Hacker News

WireGuard support in Mikrotik RouterOS v7.1beta2

forum.mikrotik.com

11–20 of 79 posts

Re: WireGuard support in Mikrotik RouterOS v7.1beta2

#12
post #2

That was actually really fast considering how long wireguard has(n't) been around. We don't even have it in stable Linux distributions yet. I guess there is some significant demand for it from Mikrotik's customers. I'll probably use it.

There are lots of stable Linux distros running the stable kernel which is 5.8. it is just distros like RHEL that call themselves stable, but are actually antiquated and honestly just give users a bad experience because most of the software is outdated. Wouldn't expect anything less from IBM.

Re: WireGuard support in Mikrotik RouterOS v7.1beta2

#14
post #2

That was actually really fast considering how long wireguard has(n't) been around. We don't even have it in stable Linux distributions yet. I guess there is some significant demand for it from Mikrotik's customers. I'll probably use it.

There are lots of stable Linux distros running the stable kernel which is 5.8. it is just distros like RHEL that call themselves stable, but are actually antiquated and honestly just give users a bad experience because most of the software is outdated. Wouldn't expect anything less from IBM.

Redhat did that before they were bought by IBM.

Re: WireGuard support in Mikrotik RouterOS v7.1beta2

#16
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are lots of stable Linux distros running the stable kernel which is 5.8. it is just distros like RHEL that call themselves stable, but are actually antiquated and honestly just give users a bad experience because most of the software is outdated. Wouldn't expect anything less from IBM.

Redhat did that before they were bought by IBM.

I was never a fan of RHEL even before they got purchased. They've done some great things lately with Podman, Buildah, Skopeo, etc but never really been an innovator when it comes to desktop Linux. I see Arch and Alpine being the real innovators, and projects like wlroots.

Re: WireGuard support in Mikrotik RouterOS v7.1beta2

#17
post #4
post #2

That was actually really fast considering how long wireguard has(n't) been around. We don't even have it in stable Linux distributions yet. I guess there is some significant demand for it from Mikrotik's customers. I'll probably use it.

Mikrotik users were requesting support of Wireguard since 2018 but Mikrotik didn't do it because Wireguard wasn't v1.0. At that time, wireguard.com listed dozen of OS/distributions you can use with wg. Mikrotik thread: https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=134093

[deleted]

Re: WireGuard support in Mikrotik RouterOS v7.1beta2

#18
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Redhat did that before they were bought by IBM.

I was never a fan of RHEL even before they got purchased. They've done some great things lately with Podman, Buildah, Skopeo, etc but never really been an innovator when it comes to desktop Linux. I see Arch and Alpine being the real innovators, and projects like wlroots.

[deleted]

Re: WireGuard support in Mikrotik RouterOS v7.1beta2

#19
post #7
post #5

Has MikroTik ever made any source code available?

who knows, but I run openwrt on my mikrotik rb2011* switches.

Do you happen to know, if the RB2011 will be stuck on the (dead-end) ar71xx release, or whether somebody is working on porting it to the newer ath79 platform with LTS?
Post reply on HN