> Textbooks state that, in the absence of a minimum wage, a worker is paid his “marginal product of labour”, which means the value of what he produces. > Just as a monopolist can set prices higher than would be the case in a competitive market, a monopsonist can set prices artificially lower. A lot of economic arguments forget these ideas. The labor market is not a free market: companies have more power in negotiatio…
Also, do textbooks actually say that? Because it seems trivially false: if a worker is actually paid that, then there's no money left for investors.
The takeaway is that Econ theory only explains what it’s capable of explaining. The real market clearly has a lot more going on than purely rational actors exchanging goods and services.