As an Aspie, (almost) every neurotypical person seems to be a pathological liar, not able to make a small talk without committing a few lies. Examples: "I am fine, thanks", "You look great!", "It is a wonderful idea!", "You are our best client", "For our company privacy is a priority", etc, etc.
Reminds me how it took me a pretty long time to understand that there are things people know to be true, but kind of wink-nudge pretend is otherwise. For example gambling is illegal here in Japan. Yet there are pachinko games, where you get prizes, which you can later exchange for money. Everyone knows this is gambling, yet everyone pretends that it is not. Now I wonder what else everyone knows to be true that I stil…
Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
101–110 of 115 posts
Re: Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's just business talk, not lies.
Yea, "I'm fine" when you're really not, isn't a lie because there's no intent to deceive. No one actually expects you to tell you how you truly are when they ask "How are you?". So if anything, the initial question is more the lie because it implies concern for the person being asked when it's really just a salutation.
Reading the description of the study in OP article (but not the source paper), I felt there was no way to tell how reliable the result might be without knowing a great deal about how the study framed their questions.
Re: Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
Communication is about shared meaning. The shared meaning here is truthful; it's not so much about the words themselves. If your hearer grew up being taught to hear "How are you?" as a meaningless introduction, and you really wanted to know how they were, you would probably say "How are you really?". Isn't that redundant? Why not just say "How are you?"? Because you are aiming for shared meaning, not accuracy in abso…
I understand nuance in communication, but its so obviously a lie when a business says they care about you, you are their most priviledged customer etc, etc. They are literally baseless claims that dress up awkward scenarios. They are lies, but people accept them as part of the process.
But that context matters because if it's both accepted and expected to the extent no one would make any material decision based on it, then there's no material intent to deceive, much less expected or actual harm.
I do agree that such meaningless platitudes are better left unsaid as they's just a waste of time.
Re: Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
#104Dear parents: never let your kids lie, at any age. It might be cute when they're 3 or 4 or 5, but if you don't gently tell them that "we don't tell lies, we always tell the truth" it will become a habit they will carry into adulthood.
Re: Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
#105Dear parents: never let your kids lie, at any age. It might be cute when they're 3 or 4 or 5, but if you don't gently tell them that "we don't tell lies, we always tell the truth" it will become a habit they will carry into adulthood.
We have a 12 year-old with ADHD, and I suspect he's a pathological liar; we call him out on it all the time, but even then, when we ask him a question - even innocuous things like "have you had breakfast" if he's up before we are - his first instinct / default is to answer with what he thinks we want to hear. He knows he doesn't get away with it in most cases. I suspect there's two factors at play; one that he someti…
Re: Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
#106I've made a conscious effort to stop lying after reading https://samharris.org/books/lying/ Can recommend, it feels great.
Seems like an interesting read, and I thought about getting it (though I'm kind of biased since I agree with Harris' premise). But the top review on Amazon mentions that the author simply "dismisses him [Kant] by saying that he [Harris] has no reason to take Kant seriously.", especially after Kant's extensive work on the topic. (And the reviewer mentions that this seems to be common to Harris work). This is a huge vi…
I don't know why I liked him before, except I was a young atheist, and I was angry. I guess now that I'm older the whole "I am very smart" shtick is no longer appealing.
Re: Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
Uhm... good? A basic facility with lying is a fundamental social skill. Unless you intend for your children to be socially awkward / socially ineffective, lying is necessary. The point, much like physical strength or any other sort of double-edged human ability, is to plug it into their broader moral framework, to guide when and for what purposes and to what degree.
> lying is necessary. I hear this a lot but do you have any examples?
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1021369327584
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0261927X9514300...
https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/11808412/personality_a...
This was like, five minutes on google scholar. I'm not going to pretend it's a slam dunk "here's a paper from the esteemed Harvard Professor of Lying-is-Awesome, presenting the grand unified theory of 'deceptiveness and social skills are overlapping traits'," but it's pretty much the null hypothesis.
Re: Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
#108As an Aspie, (almost) every neurotypical person seems to be a pathological liar, not able to make a small talk without committing a few lies. Examples: "I am fine, thanks", "You look great!", "It is a wonderful idea!", "You are our best client", "For our company privacy is a priority", etc, etc.
Reminds me how it took me a pretty long time to understand that there are things people know to be true, but kind of wink-nudge pretend is otherwise. For example gambling is illegal here in Japan. Yet there are pachinko games, where you get prizes, which you can later exchange for money. Everyone knows this is gambling, yet everyone pretends that it is not. Now I wonder what else everyone knows to be true that I stil…
Re: Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
#109Dear parents: never let your kids lie, at any age. It might be cute when they're 3 or 4 or 5, but if you don't gently tell them that "we don't tell lies, we always tell the truth" it will become a habit they will carry into adulthood.
This, ironically, would be lying to your kids. There are very few (if any) pathological truth-tellers and you are likely not one of them. Any health adult would intentionally lies in certain situations and would be considered foolish/dumb if they didn't. Your kids will inevitably catch you lying and their understanding of "lying is bad" would become "lying is bad if you get caught" and "You're allowed to be outraged…
Re: Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
> lying is necessary. I hear this a lot but do you have any examples?
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/014616729420300... https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1021369327584 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0261927X9514300... https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/11808412/personality_a... This was like, five minutes on google scholar. I'm not going to pretend it's a slam dunk "here's a paper from the esteemed Harvard Professor of Lying-is-Awesome, presenti…