Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
1–10 of 115 posts
Re: Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
#2Re: Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
#3Re: Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
#4That's lower than I expected.
Re: Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
#5Dear parents: never let your kids lie, at any age. It might be cute when they're 3 or 4 or 5, but if you don't gently tell them that "we don't tell lies, we always tell the truth" it will become a habit they will carry into adulthood.
While, on its face, it seems like a good idea to discourage lying, presenting children with such a binary approach to deception might leave them underprepared for the "bullshit" (marketing, propaganda, etc...) they will encounter in the real world.
EDIT: I'm not a parent and don't want to offer parenting advice. My point is simply that saying "we never lie" seems overly-reductive, versus something more nuanced like "lying is bad." I would worry about creating the expectation that most people don't lie, or even that good people never lie (e.g. white lies).
Re: Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
#6Can recommend, it feels great.
Re: Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
#7Re: Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
#8Re: Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
#9Examples: "I am fine, thanks", "You look great!", "It is a wonderful idea!", "You are our best client", "For our company privacy is a priority", etc, etc.