Live data from Hacker News

The Montessori Mafia

blogs.wsj.com

41–50 of 160 posts

Re: The Montessori Mafia

#41
post #4

I really like the idea of Montessori, and if I have the cash I'd like to send my future kids there someday. That being said, I see correlation here, not causation. To be a little bit tongue and cheek, I could write the headline: "99% of successful people do not attend Montessori schools"

The real meat is the 1996 study they mention: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/313/5795/1893.full?ijkey=3... Although they reference the study in a really odd way: "Neuroscience author Jonah Lehrer cites a 2006 study published in Science that ..." What does Jonah Lehrer have to do with the study? AFAICT absolutely nothing. He appears to be a contributor to the WSJ, but he didn't write the study. And none of the link…

You need to go through this link (http://www.montessori-science.org/montessori_science_journal...) and click "see article full text" to get access to the study linked above.

Re: The Montessori Mafia

#42
post #11

I went to a Waldorf/Steiner school, which shares some of these traits such as the lack of a focus on assessment and grading and the emphasis on creativity. We weren't taught the alphabet until the age of about 6-7 and basic arithmetic at 7-8. We did begin learning foreign languages at age 6, however. In practice my older brother taught me to read and count well before the Steiner curriculum did, but I still think tha…

    I think that creativity in adults is often stifled because they don't 
    want to "get it wrong". People are afraid of trying their hand at a 
    new skill or taking a risk on a new idea because they are "realistic" 
    about their chances of success.
There is a fantastic TED talk by Sir Ken Robinson on this exact subject. By far one of my favorites.

http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/ken_robinson_says_schools_...

Re: The Montessori Mafia

#43

Is this even correlation? Is there any evidence to suggest that Montessori students are over-represented among the successful? Or are they simply proportionate?

Even if they were disproportionately represented, it wouldn't prove much -- only that parents of smart children are more likely to send them to a Montessori school.

Re: The Montessori Mafia

#45
post #36
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is exactly right. I suspect that the parents of people who attend Montessori schools are more educated than average to begin with. Go into an inner city Los Angeles elementary, and I guarantee you the great majority of parents wont have even heard of the name. TL;DR: the parents of people who care enough about their education to enroll them in a montessori school, would have probably turned out pretty bright kid…

The article mentions a study that shows the direct influence of a Montessori school. The study was published in Science . You can read it here: http://www.montessori-science.org/montessori_science_journal... (click "see article full text") An excerpt: On several dimensions, children at a public inner city Montessori school had superior outcomes relative to a sample of Montessori applicants who, because of a random lo…

[deleted]

Re: The Montessori Mafia

#49
post #4

I really like the idea of Montessori, and if I have the cash I'd like to send my future kids there someday. That being said, I see correlation here, not causation. To be a little bit tongue and cheek, I could write the headline: "99% of successful people do not attend Montessori schools"

The correlation != causation problem was addressed in this comment: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2416781 .

Re: The Montessori Mafia

#50
post #8

Fascinating insight. But isn't this a classic case of of correlation, not causation?

Puffy did Montessori and he's doing pretty damn well for himself!

Jay-Z started in the projects and didn't finish high school, and he's doing even better!

Holy crap, I know where I'm sending my kids!

Post reply on HN