Live data from Hacker News

Dear Google Cloud: Your Deprecation Policy Is Killing You

medium.com

21–30 of 417 posts

Re: Dear Google Cloud: Your Deprecation Policy Is Killing You

#21
I can hear cries from tenderfoot developers whining about supporting multiple options and backwards compatibility...

"But that's sooooo muuuuch too teeessstt!! Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!"

But that's your job dude. So what if it costs more money and time. Fucking pay for it anyway.

I feel like startup software dev needs a swift kick in the ass or three with that phrase.... "do it anyway!"

Who fucking cares if these founder assholes only make an 800% return instead of 900%? Do it right.

Re: Dear Google Cloud: Your Deprecation Policy Is Killing You

#23

The answer to why this is, I’m beginning to realize after talking to dozens of Googlers working at Google as acquaintances, friends, former coworkers, HN comments and twitter personalities is - Google has an active disrespect if you’re not part of their in group . If you haven’t passed their tests, you’re basically an object of derision - a mark, an object just used for incrementing a CPM metric, or an incompetent, l…

I have worked at a few orgs and I've heard so many time the "because we are Google" to explain why a product will be used. I've never understood that mentality; I've never understood people being proud basically about a product somebody else built 20 years ago.

I do believe leadership is failing Google, and their lack of vision is starting to affect the company. There was quite a bit of inertia, but I fear search might drop in the next 5 years and there will be nothing ready to replace ads.

Re: Dear Google Cloud: Your Deprecation Policy Is Killing You

#24

The answer to why this is, I’m beginning to realize after talking to dozens of Googlers working at Google as acquaintances, friends, former coworkers, HN comments and twitter personalities is - Google has an active disrespect if you’re not part of their in group . If you haven’t passed their tests, you’re basically an object of derision - a mark, an object just used for incrementing a CPM metric, or an incompetent, l…

I wonder if this is a result of Google not having users/customers but data points?

Re: Dear Google Cloud: Your Deprecation Policy Is Killing You

#26
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is not endemic. I think you've met a few people you didn't like, read some tweets, and extrapolated poorly. And I don't think people working on GCP are really treated that much better than their counterparts at AWS. The fact that you think the difference in product depreciation policy between them is caused by people getting "everything they could dream of" is funny though

Trips to Europe or to random conferences in first class? Trips to _any office_ for "face time"? Massages? Bonuses of any sort, including peer bonuses and holiday gifts? Refreshers? Society thinking that you're "smart" for passing the loop? You're rewarded just for being alive at Google, but I get nothing but scorn and condescension. Fun fact for you - if I get promoted this year at Amazon to L5, I'll _still_ make les…

> Fun fact for you - if I get promoted this year at Amazon to L5, I'll _still_ make less than a new grad at Google.

This doesn't appear to be close to true based on levels.fyi, unless you're severely underpaid for an Amazon L5.

Re: Dear Google Cloud: Your Deprecation Policy Is Killing You

#27
It's odd to see an article emphasising backwards compatibility, but not a single mention of Microsoft (I even ctrl+F'd the page source to check!) They've regressed a bit in the recent years but I'd still consider MS the gold standard for back-compat. I have Win32 binaries I last modified over 15 years ago, small (or perhaps tiny - size measured in KBs) utilities that I use daily. They worked perfectly on Win95, and still do on Win10.

I wonder when/if the software industry will ever stabilise. It's possibly the only industry where frequent and disruptive change continues to happen, and is even welcomed by many in it (not me).

Re: Dear Google Cloud: Your Deprecation Policy Is Killing You

#28
post #22

Besides AWS and Azure what's the third major cloud provider he's referring to? (I can think of others, just haven't really thought any were close to Amazon/Microsoft/Google.)

Was wondering the same thing. Alibaba? IBM?

Last I checked Alibaba was 3rd in the international market and Oracle cloud was growing. Steve might be referring to Oracle getting 3rd place.

Re: Dear Google Cloud: Your Deprecation Policy Is Killing You

#29
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is not endemic. I think you've met a few people you didn't like, read some tweets, and extrapolated poorly. And I don't think people working on GCP are really treated that much better than their counterparts at AWS. The fact that you think the difference in product depreciation policy between them is caused by people getting "everything they could dream of" is funny though

Trips to Europe or to random conferences in first class? Trips to _any office_ for "face time"? Massages? Bonuses of any sort, including peer bonuses and holiday gifts? Refreshers? Society thinking that you're "smart" for passing the loop? You're rewarded just for being alive at Google, but I get nothing but scorn and condescension. Fun fact for you - if I get promoted this year at Amazon to L5, I'll _still_ make les…

The saying goes that if you want a raise, you have to negotiate for it at your new job. Internal promotions typically make less than an outsider coming in for the same position. Some corps say that pay bumps have a max, so internal employees hit that max when getting promoted even though that max is still below what a new hire would be brought in at. I've run into that personally. I fixed it by getting a new job for a new company. When you negotiate that new job's salary, you have to make sure you're going to be okay with it for the next few years while the cycle starts over. And people wonder why job stints are so short today.

Re: Dear Google Cloud: Your Deprecation Policy Is Killing You

#30

The answer to why this is, I’m beginning to realize after talking to dozens of Googlers working at Google as acquaintances, friends, former coworkers, HN comments and twitter personalities is - Google has an active disrespect if you’re not part of their in group . If you haven’t passed their tests, you’re basically an object of derision - a mark, an object just used for incrementing a CPM metric, or an incompetent, l…

On the other hand, when someone expresses an opinion like this, you never know if they were contacted at some point by a Google recruiter and ended up with a case of sour grapes.

I had a phone conversation with a hiring manager once, and obviously I was not the right type or class or caste or something, but it wasn't a technical screen at all, so it's a mystery to me forever what exactly determined the "in group" as you put it.

As such, I know I'm biased towards them, but I can't really assess the overall company.

Post reply on HN