Gitoxide: Pure Rust Implementation of Git
1–10 of 200 posts
Re: Gitoxide: Pure Rust Implementation of Git
#2If it's not broken, don't fix it...
Re: Gitoxide: Pure Rust Implementation of Git
#3Why do people feel the need to reimplement everything in Rust ? If it's not broken, don't fix it...
Why are people writing new programming languages? After all we already have some. Sometimes you do it for fun and frivolity, sometimes because you think you can do better, sometimes because you are addressing real tangible issues with the old way of doing things and often a combination of the three.
Re: Gitoxide: Pure Rust Implementation of Git
#4Why do people feel the need to reimplement everything in Rust ? If it's not broken, don't fix it...
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24133128 for a recent, very relevant discussion on that topic with multiple examples and a good rationale.
Re: Gitoxide: Pure Rust Implementation of Git
#5Why do people feel the need to reimplement everything in Rust ? If it's not broken, don't fix it...
Re: Gitoxide: Pure Rust Implementation of Git
#6Re: Gitoxide: Pure Rust Implementation of Git
#7Re: Gitoxide: Pure Rust Implementation of Git
#8Why do people feel the need to reimplement everything in Rust ? If it's not broken, don't fix it...
I was this close to just calling git from the shell when i eventually just gave up.
Re: Gitoxide: Pure Rust Implementation of Git
#9Why do people feel the need to reimplement everything in Rust ? If it's not broken, don't fix it...
Re: Gitoxide: Pure Rust Implementation of Git
#10Why do people feel the need to reimplement everything in Rust ? If it's not broken, don't fix it...
Second reason, for fun.
Third reason, didn't you note all the parallelization gains?