Live data from Hacker News

Writing Clear, Concise, Sentences

writing.wisc.edu

11–20 of 75 posts

Re: Writing Clear, Concise, Sentences

#13
post #2

I'm positive the second comma shouldn't be there. (I wouldn't normally comment on commas, but it seems on-topic...)

It depends on what you mean by "shouldn't". The Oxford comma is optional and considered syntactically correct if used. If you mean that it is more concise to leave it out, then thats another issue.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma

EDIT: Ignore this. I thought he was referring to the first line of the post. "Follow the principles below to write sentences that are clear, to the point, and easier to read."

Re: Writing Clear, Concise, Sentences

#15
post #2

I'm positive the second comma shouldn't be there. (I wouldn't normally comment on commas, but it seems on-topic...)

It depends on what you mean by "shouldn't". The Oxford comma is optional and considered syntactically correct if used. If you mean that it is more concise to leave it out, then thats another issue. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma EDIT: Ignore this. I thought he was referring to the first line of the post. "Follow the principles below to write sentences that are clear, to the point, and easier to read."

This is not a case of Serial commas. The title "Writing Clear, Concise, Sentences" has two adjectives and one noun. It's not a list of three.

Re: Writing Clear, Concise, Sentences

#16
> Writing Clear, Concise, Sentences

With a title like this, I won't even read the thing. So many things are wrong with this first sentence. 1. Why The Capitals For Each Word? That screws with my human word recognition algorithm. 2. The title implies three things: Writing clear, do something concise and something with sentences. That's all but clear to me. "Writing clear": you mean writing the word clear? Does not sound interesting to me. What do you want with "Sentences" and "Concise"? Not clear at all to me. 3. Probably, the author meant something like "How to write clear & concise sentences". That gives the sentence instantly another meaning.

Re: Writing Clear, Concise, Sentences

#18
post #16

> Writing Clear, Concise, Sentences With a title like this, I won't even read the thing. So many things are wrong with this first sentence. 1. Why The Capitals For Each Word? That screws with my human word recognition algorithm. 2. The title implies three things: Writing clear, do something concise and something with sentences. That's all but clear to me. "Writing clear": you mean writing the word clear? Does not sou…

Having not even read the thing, you might consider whether a detailed critical comment about the thing adds or subtracts to the discussion on HN.

Re: Writing Clear, Concise, Sentences

#19
This advice seems to mimic much of what's in _Style: Towards Clarity and Grace_, which I found out about from Richard Gabriel (achievement unlocked: LISP connection) and which is probably the most hacker-friendly writing book ever written.

Re: Writing Clear, Concise, Sentences

#20
post #6
post #2

I'm positive the second comma shouldn't be there. (I wouldn't normally comment on commas, but it seems on-topic...)

Yep. They managed to refute their own title in four words, I am impressed.

Exactly what I thought.

I would have written "Writing clear and concise sentences"

Post reply on HN