Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is 100% nothing stopping the Federal government from offering a full-faith-and-credit-backed "America electronic transaction system" for electronic transactions, with those fees handled by taxes. But much as there's nothing stopping the Federal government from greatly simplifying the burden and toil of tax season by issuing 90% of Americans a pre-filled-out "This is what you owe; sign this and return it or disp…
It's extremely naive to think that only Republicans are responsible for that.
The case for why Google should be regulated as a public utility
141–150 of 399 posts
Re: The case for why Google should be regulated as a public utility
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
The proposal of what to do is for the Justice Department to sue them for antitrust violations and for the courts to break up the divisions of the company that engage in unlawful anticompetitive behavior. Not only is it plausible we saw it done with Microsoft, and the result was an explosion of entrepreneurship and innovation in the relevant markets, which were software and internet services.
No, Microsoft was never broken up. That was the initial judgment. The case ended in a settlement [0] which didn't require all that much from Microsoft. The obligations have now long expired. [0] https://www.justice.gov/atr/case-document/file/503541/downlo...
But the threat stopped them from dominating the browser market and enabled the first dot-com explosion.
We would be way better off today if there was a powerful countervailing force to all this FAANG consolidation. The current environment is deeply harmful to innovation.
Re: The case for why Google should be regulated as a public utility
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't you think you're putting an unreasonably high burden on people? I can argue that I think the lawmakers representing me and other citizens need to figure out the details without myself having figured out the details. I can point out a problem and ask someone to fix the problem without know what the specifics of the solution look like. I know healthcare is absurdly complicated but I still think single-payer is th…
Where I live, the largest public utility is being sanctioned for criminal manslaughter and burning down large portions of the state. So I think the specifics are rather important.
Re: The case for why Google should be regulated as a public utility
#144I really wish google had public data for something like average page number or something similar for a search term. We have data for what people are searching for, but its hard to determine how successful people are in finding what they're looking for. If you're searching for a niche, it would be great to know what people want but can't find. I suspect google already has this data, but it's too valuable for them to s…
Re: The case for why Google should be regulated as a public utility
#145On top of search, one of the real issues is that they set their ad prices with no market forces at play. $50 per click? Why yes, but only because they say so... Fake click? We say its real, pay us...
There are several other competing ad networks, as well as traditional advertising models. Nobody actually has to play Google's ad game; companies continue to crunch the numbers and decide it works out best for them in terms of dollar-per-value-add.
Re: The case for why Google should be regulated as a public utility
#146Re: The case for why Google should be regulated as a public utility
#147Re: The case for why Google should be regulated as a public utility
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
yes i know that. are we going to back to the days where I pay for my groceries by writing a check? you can’t possibly be arguing that ACH and wire transfers make sense for everyday purchases.
Why wouldn’t ACH make sense for everyday purchases?
if the Fed’s faster payment network goes live and makes ACH instantaneous can payments can be done with a QR code or something similar then that is viable but not right now.
beyond that, almost no e-commerce store accepts ACH. It also doesn’t benefit the consumer to bother with the hassle of ACH vs card when there’s no discount...you’re just saving the merchant money. Amazon is the only one I can think of.
Re: The case for why Google should be regulated as a public utility
#149One Google quirk I've been thinking about lately is the times when you search for something and the thing you want is the top advertised and organic result. Seems like a waste of money. An example, if you search for "heroku" then you get an ad for heroku, which, yeah, is what I was searching for, but heroku is also the top result and obviously what I was looking for. Heroku is paying Google to provide Google with the…
I don’t recall which, but I searched for a brand name recently and their web site was number five or six. Pinterest was higher, which drives me nuts.
Re: The case for why Google should be regulated as a public utility
#150Google is a private corporation that runs various free services, i.e. you are the product. You agreed to their terms and services. If you don't like that, you can use a competitor. As long as there's an open internet infrastructure, there's no anti-competitive behavior. Everyone can be a google competitor of one of its services. Case in point, DuckDuckGo etc. If you want to regulate something, start with the ISPs and…
Search engine web interface doesn't require users to accept anything. Search crawler indexes the web without any contractual relations with web site owners.
> you can use a competitor
As a search engine user, I can and I do.
However, the party most affected by the monopoly is web site owners. They can't do that.
> start with the ISPs and restore net neutrality
Where I live, I have a choice of 2 wired broadband ISPs, 3 wireless with comparable speeds (30-40 mbit/sec in practice). To my knowledge, none of them filters or prioritizes traffic. I generally support net neutrality but I'm not affected my the lack of these laws. This is unlike search engine monopoly: despite I don't personally use google search, most other people do.