Live data from Hacker News

EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas

wsj.com

11–20 of 213 posts

Re: EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas

#11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bernie Sanders supported not only going 100% renewables as quickly as possible, but also banning hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") [1]. Silver lining is Aramco and COVID is doing what American's politicians didn't have the fortitude to do: force the scaling down of the US oil and gas industry and the inherent reduction in fossil demand from reducing commuting and air travel (respectively). I'm unsure how anyone can a…

....we had a chance to really fix our country with him. I don't know when another candidate of his honesty, consistency and moral caliber will appear again; if ever. My countrymen baffle me ...I really enjoyed phone banking.

Appreciate your efforts, we have lots of work left to do as a nation. Don't give up, every election cycle the demographics shift even further [1] [2] due to younger cohorts aging into voting rights and older cohorts aging out.

[1] https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/03/20/a-wider-par...

[2] https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2019/11/25/u-s-public-vi...

Re: EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas

#13
post #8

I suggest changing the headline to "outgoing administration continues to sabotage government for next administration as popularity continues to decline during incompetent response to viral pandemic". Another example of something that was so important they waited until less than 3 months before the election to do it. It hardly needs saying, but this is devastatingly bad environmental and climate policy.

Clearly this whole situation is political but I'd make 2 points. 1. You might be surprised at the election outcome. 2. The headline is based on the article, not what people think it should be.

[deleted]

Re: EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas

#15

It’s very hard to understand why the current administration has such an urge to roll back environmental regulations. I grew up in a time when rivers were red or green depending on what type of leather the factory upstream was processing at the time. The only fish you could see were dead. Breathing in cities was hard. Environmental regulation is a big success story that improved the lives of countless people while com…

Follow the money.

Re: EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas

#16

I suggest changing the headline to "outgoing administration continues to sabotage government for next administration as popularity continues to decline during incompetent response to viral pandemic". Another example of something that was so important they waited until less than 3 months before the election to do it. It hardly needs saying, but this is devastatingly bad environmental and climate policy.

Don’t post the desired results on here. Go make phone calls and help the campaign you care about.

Re: EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas

#18
post #8

I suggest changing the headline to "outgoing administration continues to sabotage government for next administration as popularity continues to decline during incompetent response to viral pandemic". Another example of something that was so important they waited until less than 3 months before the election to do it. It hardly needs saying, but this is devastatingly bad environmental and climate policy.

Clearly this whole situation is political but I'd make 2 points. 1. You might be surprised at the election outcome. 2. The headline is based on the article, not what people think it should be.

I can only have my confidence in the U.S. voting public renewed or absolutely shattered this November.

Re: EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas

#19

I suggest changing the headline to "outgoing administration continues to sabotage government for next administration as popularity continues to decline during incompetent response to viral pandemic". Another example of something that was so important they waited until less than 3 months before the election to do it. It hardly needs saying, but this is devastatingly bad environmental and climate policy.

The good news is that past Trump administration environmental rollbacks have been so sloppy and so hasty that they've actually ended up being overturned in some courts, and the resulting legal ambiguity that has resulted has actually resulted in fossil fuels projects becoming less viable since they're guaranteed to be tied up in litigation.

Re: EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas

#20

It’s very hard to understand why the current administration has such an urge to roll back environmental regulations. I grew up in a time when rivers were red or green depending on what type of leather the factory upstream was processing at the time. The only fish you could see were dead. Breathing in cities was hard. Environmental regulation is a big success story that improved the lives of countless people while com…

> It’s very hard to understand why the current administration has such an urge to roll back environmental regulations.

No, it's very easy. Environmental regulations cost money. Lots of money. It's much more profitable to keep these externalities.

Post reply on HN