Why Some People Can Run on Little Sleep and Get So Much Done
11–20 of 131 posts
Re: Why Some People Can Run on Little Sleep and Get So Much Done
#12There are two circumstances in which I get less than 7 hours of sleep a night: if I'm really stressed about getting something done, or if I'm really excited about getting something done.
In the first place the lack of sleep exacerbates the stress and really starts to weigh on me. But in the second case it doesn't seem to have much negative effect.
Now if only I could continuously keep my motivation up...
Re: Why Some People Can Run on Little Sleep and Get So Much Done
#13Damn you, science! I’ve read so many studies saying there’s absolutely no way you can get by without at least 7 hours sleep and now you tell me that that completely doesn’t apply to 1-3% of the population?! That’s actually not that small of a percentage. How big were the sample sizes of all the other studies? Did nobody encounter at least one of these low-sleep requiring people? Maybe they were just eliminated as bei…
Don't. If you insist on only giving advice that applies to 100% of the world you'll never say anything useful at all.
I'm sure the studies do encounter these people. But studies use statistics. These people are on the far edge of the bell curve. The mean [1] is probably around 7-9 hours. But just because the far edge of the bell curve has very few samples in it doesn't mean that those samples don't exist, nor that someone is "hiding" them.
Which reminds me: What this article does not talk about is the other side of the bell curve: The folks who need considerably more than 7-9 hours of sleep to attain peak performance and happiness. Or maybe those people don't exist, because the "bell curve" is actually a bimodal distribution, or cliff-shaped, or something. We could tell if there was any actual data here, or a link to the actual data and published science -- we could look at the shape of the distribution. But this is an article by a science journalist, so naturally it is nigh-useless.
I wonder why the article doesn't talk about the "long sleepers"? Probably because the sleep researcher quoted herein is correct: There are more people who like to believe that they only need four hours' sleep than there are actual people who thrive on less sleep. And I'm sure that no Wall Street Journal wants to learn that they might really need twelve hours sleep.
---
[1] I actually have no idea if the "7-9 hour" rule of thumb is based on a mean, a median, or a mode. Pity that nobody ever links to the original research.
Re: Why Some People Can Run on Little Sleep and Get So Much Done
#14If they cannot find any "actual" short sleepers, how do they it's 1-3% of population...Oh science you are scary...
Re: Why Some People Can Run on Little Sleep and Get So Much Done
#15Re: Why Some People Can Run on Little Sleep and Get So Much Done
#16Here's some information I mostly agree with: http://www.supermemo.com/articles/sleep.htm
Re: Why Some People Can Run on Little Sleep and Get So Much Done
#17Re: Why Some People Can Run on Little Sleep and Get So Much Done
#18It's a false dichotomy, on a lot of hard problems progress is a step function, and you often "get much done" while sleeping. I.e. when you wake up well rested you see things from a different angle. If it's something like chopping wood, sure, the less you sleep the more wood you chop, within reasonable limits, but I don't think that is what these articles aim for. I think it's wrong to look at sleep as a waste of time…
I'm not sure if there has been any actual studies that show that longer sleep-times given ad-libitum sleeping is more effective in helping the brain process more information during the sleep phase.