I thought (and maybe just my personal conspiracy feeling) that banks lagged on transactions mainly to hold on to the cash longer and get interest. Secondary thought was just poor old technology debt. Something akin to hearing that payroll at a large company was a batch job dumping a ton of text files to a share or something and the bank slurped them up for direct deposit.
Fed announces details of new interbank service to support instant payments
71–80 of 431 posts
Re: Fed announces details of new interbank service to support instant payments
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
We will still need banks’ mobile apps to support this kind of transfer (FedNow). Considering that I’ve never been able to do wire transfers by mobile app with two major US banks (but Zelle transfer by mobile app? Of course!), I’m not confident this will replace Zelle, Venmo, etc for some time. Sure, in 10 years or so... but don’t hold your breath.
At least they’re finally working on it.
It'll take a while, but it's nice to know a decent end state is on the roadmap.
Re: Fed announces details of new interbank service to support instant payments
#73> The rapid expenditure of COVID emergency relief payments highlighted the critical importance of having a resilient instant payments infrastructure with nationwide reach, especially for households and small businesses with cash flow constraints," The main issue with releasing cash as I understand it wasn’t that it wasn’t arriving fast enough; rather it was verifying the recipient was eligible and was who they say th…
What's the concern about national ID and political enemies? First, your life is already pretty bad if you don't have either federal or state ID at all. It's hard to drive, it's hard to fly, it's hard to get a paycheck. (You can live off the land in the middle of nowhere and avoid contact with the outside world, but you're not much of a political enemy for anyone if you do.) So, your data is already in some sort of da…
I completely agree that a national ID would not enable the US government to do anything that it can't already do. But enough people in the US react to this sort of thing emotionally, not logically.
Technically we already do have a national ID: the passport. But relatively few Americans actually hold passports (when compared to, say, Europeans), and the federal and state governments would get a lot of push-back if they required passports for common things like banking. Hell, there are enough un- and under-banked people in the US due to other socioeconomic barriers; adding another would not be great.
Re: Fed announces details of new interbank service to support instant payments
#74How come the US -- the biggest economy in the world, and home of the most sophisticated banking sector on the planet -- is still not equipped with such a system? Are banks resisting it and if yes, why would they?
Because there are already alternatives for transactions that have to instantly settle - like SWIFT or FedWire.
Re: Fed announces details of new interbank service to support instant payments
#75> The rapid expenditure of COVID emergency relief payments highlighted the critical importance of having a resilient instant payments infrastructure with nationwide reach, especially for households and small businesses with cash flow constraints," The main issue with releasing cash as I understand it wasn’t that it wasn’t arriving fast enough; rather it was verifying the recipient was eligible and was who they say th…
> […] a national ID which I am more against the more I hear about […] The US already has a de facto one AFAICT: the Social Security Number (SSN). Unique to every individual, assigned from birth (or whenever applied for), and which never changes for the life of the person until they die. > Many countries issued such numbers for a singular purpose, but over time, they become a de facto national identification number. F…
Not sure how Europe handles this, but here in Korea phone numbers are tied to government-issued photo IDs. Sellers of phones have to fax ID scans to the central office for verification. Remote transactions such as signing up for a credit card require phone name + first half of ID + phone number 2FA at a minimum.
As a result, I'm not aware of any cases of identity theft. US infrastructure is so broken.
Re: Fed announces details of new interbank service to support instant payments
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your Visa transactions are running through older TPF 360 assembler. Old isn't an excuse for bad.
It’s not bad. It is simply a product of its time: according to planet money in that 2013 piece, ACH batch processing runs only once per day and only during bank hours (no weekends, etc). Presumably, increasing that frequency would break something in the system or it would already have been done. In the ‘70s, no one predicted 24/7 banking or even ATMs let alone internet payments. I remember my father using an ATM for…
Re: Fed announces details of new interbank service to support instant payments
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
Americans have such a strange relationship with technology... the most innovative startups, and yet the worse infrastructure. here in Europe it's the contrary :) and btw: the service will be active in 2023 or 2024... while I enjoy immediate transfers bank to bank since years...
Two things (probably more) contribute to this, I think: 1) Americans have been trained from birth to distrust government in all forms. Centralizing more and more services triggers a visceral fear response. (IMO it's nonsense, for the most part, but it's there nonetheless.) 2) Being "first to market" with new technologies often means you're just stuck with the sub-optimal first version, while other countries can learn…
This is mostly for tax evasion reasons and sometimes for employees skimming off the top. The more “proper” a place, the less likely they are to encourage cash transactions.
Happens in US too, of course. It’s always the shady places that are cash only and everyone else is digital.
Re: Fed announces details of new interbank service to support instant payments
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
Americans have such a strange relationship with technology... the most innovative startups, and yet the worse infrastructure. here in Europe it's the contrary :) and btw: the service will be active in 2023 or 2024... while I enjoy immediate transfers bank to bank since years...
Two things (probably more) contribute to this, I think: 1) Americans have been trained from birth to distrust government in all forms. Centralizing more and more services triggers a visceral fear response. (IMO it's nonsense, for the most part, but it's there nonetheless.) 2) Being "first to market" with new technologies often means you're just stuck with the sub-optimal first version, while other countries can learn…
There’s advantages and disadvantages to being early.
Re: Fed announces details of new interbank service to support instant payments
#79Nearly all first world countries enjoy instant payments at the point of sale and person to person. It boggles my mind that it has taken this long and a pandemic to even set the gears in motion, all while battling ridiculous levels of cheque and credit card fraud.
Americans have such a strange relationship with technology... the most innovative startups, and yet the worse infrastructure. here in Europe it's the contrary :) and btw: the service will be active in 2023 or 2024... while I enjoy immediate transfers bank to bank since years...
Nobody in the US wants to pay for infrastructure. It's the governments role, but political figures want to spend our money in less critical ways.