Live data from Hacker News

Why Apple believes it’s an AI leader–and why it says critics have it all wrong

arstechnica.com

111–120 of 217 posts

Re: Why Apple believes it’s an AI leader–and why it says critics have it all wrong

#111
post #84

"Google is an amazing company, and there's some really great technologists working there," he said. "But fundamentally, their business model is different and they're not known for shipping consumer experiences that are used by hundreds of millions of people." What does he mean by this? Google search and Android are both used by more than a billion people. YouTube over 2 billion. These are all bigger than any Apple pr…

[deleted]

Re: Why Apple believes it’s an AI leader–and why it says critics have it all wrong

#112
post #84

"Google is an amazing company, and there's some really great technologists working there," he said. "But fundamentally, their business model is different and they're not known for shipping consumer experiences that are used by hundreds of millions of people." What does he mean by this? Google search and Android are both used by more than a billion people. YouTube over 2 billion. These are all bigger than any Apple pr…

I thought that was odd, too. My best guess is that he’s emphasizing “known” as in notorious. Apple is “that company that ships experiences” whereas google is that company that records you while you use their apps or whatever.

Re: Why Apple believes it’s an AI leader–and why it says critics have it all wrong

#113
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I recently discovered a neat trick for fixing the duck problem, that is, adding swear words to the iOS dictionary: add a contact with the chosen words in the name fields. E.g. I have a contact named "shit shitty fuck fuckin fucking oh shit"

I find it both amusing and ridiculous that you have to go to such great lengths to be able to type a good swear word on the iphone.

[deleted]

Re: Why Apple believes it’s an AI leader–and why it says critics have it all wrong

#114
post #61

Setting aside all the other work Apple is doing in this area, can someone explain why iMessage autocorrect is unacceptably bad (to put it diplomatically) in the era of weapons-grade language models? Its behavior is totally bizarre. It’s like an underpowered chess engine that makes flagrant blunders: capitalizing random words in the middle of a sentence (rock -> Rock), the context sensitivity of an actual rock, forcin…

I'm bilingual and write approximately the same amount of messages in both languages using iOS. Autocorrect always suggests words from BOTH languages mid sentence. Like what the hell, they should be able to infer which language I'm using just from the first word.

That sort of makes sense. I am not sure of it's prevalence, but at least for Indians, it's pretty common to code switch while writing (even more so while speaking).

Re: Why Apple believes it’s an AI leader–and why it says critics have it all wrong

#115

You can't be AI leader when every AI leader is staying away from you by 10ft pole. When Ian Goodfellow joined Apple, there was literally rain of criticism on him from ending his career as researcher to bowing down to money. I don't know of any researcher who does want to have continued research career willing to join Apple. They simply don't allow that kind of freedom or publishing results. While Apple has some stron…

It's a shame that Apple doesn't have an industrial research lab; it certainly has the funding to create a lab that would rival Microsoft Research or perhaps even legendary labs like Xerox PARC and Bell Labs. Apple used to have a lab: during the "interregnum" years of 1985 to 1997, Apple had a fantastic research group called the Advanced Technology Group, led by the late Larry Tesler. In some ways this group was a sort of spiritual successor to Xerox PARC; Larry Tesler was ex-Xerox, and the legendary Alan Kay (of Smalltalk fame) and Don Norman (who wasn't from Xerox PARC but who is a legend in usability) were involved in this group. This group worked on many interesting and important technologies, such as Quicktime, AppleScript, OpenDoc, HyperCard, speech recognition, and more. Even though the Dylan project did not come from the Advanced Technology Group, it is another example of interesting work that came out of Apple during this time period. Even though commercially Apple struggled during the latter half of the interregnum, Apple created some amazing technologies during this time period.

Of course, the Sculley/Spindler/Amelio Apple seemed to be far more open regarding research than the Jobs- and Cook-era Apple. Jobs closed down the labs in 1997 and help institute Apple's famous culture of secrecy that persists today.

Re: Why Apple believes it’s an AI leader–and why it says critics have it all wrong

#116

Setting aside all the other work Apple is doing in this area, can someone explain why iMessage autocorrect is unacceptably bad (to put it diplomatically) in the era of weapons-grade language models? Its behavior is totally bizarre. It’s like an underpowered chess engine that makes flagrant blunders: capitalizing random words in the middle of a sentence (rock -> Rock), the context sensitivity of an actual rock, forcin…

I've recently switched back to iOS and hoped this behaviour was temporary as it got to learn my swiping style. Gboard on Android is almost perfect.

There's also a Gboard for iOS. Can't compare it with the Android version, but it is much, much better than the Apple default keyboard for swipe typing. Has become my default keyboard after Swype was discontinued, with a short stint in between into Apple's standard keyboard right after they added swiping.

Re: Why Apple believes it’s an AI leader–and why it says critics have it all wrong

#118
post #99

Setting aside all the other work Apple is doing in this area, can someone explain why iMessage autocorrect is unacceptably bad (to put it diplomatically) in the era of weapons-grade language models? Its behavior is totally bizarre. It’s like an underpowered chess engine that makes flagrant blunders: capitalizing random words in the middle of a sentence (rock -> Rock), the context sensitivity of an actual rock, forcin…

To be fair, the android keyboards (like Gboard, googles own) are also bad. It's a tough problem for sure, but they haven't gotten better for the last 6-7 years at least, in my experience, and that is the point of the parent post I guess.

Gboard is not perfect and shows some erratic behavior described by the parent poster, but it isn't as bad as Apple's keyboard in my experience.

However, SwiftKey might be more conservative and feels a bit slower at times, but its autocorrect and prediction do a really good and consistent job.

Re: Why Apple believes it’s an AI leader–and why it says critics have it all wrong

#119
post #71

Setting aside all the other work Apple is doing in this area, can someone explain why iMessage autocorrect is unacceptably bad (to put it diplomatically) in the era of weapons-grade language models? Its behavior is totally bizarre. It’s like an underpowered chess engine that makes flagrant blunders: capitalizing random words in the middle of a sentence (rock -> Rock), the context sensitivity of an actual rock, forcin…

I once mentioned the rapper xxxtentacion in a text message. Now whenever I sign of an email or text to my wife with an ‘x’ iOS decides that what I actually meant to do was write ‘xxxtentacion’ and I’ve normally pressed send before I notice. After a couple of years now this is just how I talk to my wife.

For me IOS consistently suggests phrases I've used with my wife in the context of my colleagues despite me really never having addressed them "Hi honey" or "Hi darling" ... etc.

It's just pathetic nonsense to congratulate anyone on this level of nonsense.

Re: Why Apple believes it’s an AI leader–and why it says critics have it all wrong

#120
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The one the drives me mad the most is when I type a word which it incorrectly autocorrects to a proper noun (which gets capitalised), I then use backspace to delete that word and type the - completely different - correct one, but it insists on upper-casing the first letter to match the original casing of the incorrect autocorrect. It really should keep track of the fact that it introduces the case-change and invalida…

I can never make iOS write “Hong Kong” when swipe-typing; tried setting up forced text replacement entry (kong->Kong) to zero effect. It is always “Hong kong”.

Similarly I can never get iOS to type “Kings Cross”, it always forces “Kong’s Cross” even when I delete the word and retype.

PS: iOS just did this twice while typing this reply.

Post reply on HN