> The way we fought the bureaucracy was to build networks of people whose goals were aligned and whose skill sets or resources were compatible. During my stint in a bureaucractic organisation I always considered this types of people as a huge part of the problem. Instead of being candid about what they wanted, open to dialog, and making the whole system better, they forced through ideas that aligned with their own wo…
Why is this idiot running my engineering org?
121–130 of 176 posts
Re: Why is this idiot running my engineering org?
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nah.
You’re right sorry. I forgot the FBI was full of good guys.
Re: Why is this idiot running my engineering org?
#123Sorry, the story totally lost me after she was describing the interaction with the FBI. I did not easily take away some conclusion about what she had done wrong or what deep pile of shit she had just created for herself, or what on 2 paths she had just chosen incorrectly, or daringly? (The paragraph ending, "I trusted the FBI to be good at their jobs." The next paragraph jumps right to generalizations, and I didn't c…
I think she's saying that it's odd to her, as someone who innately enjoys doing highly consequential work, that other people don't share in her enthusiasm. Similarly, coworkers must find it odd that she doesn't actively dodge such work or deal with it in a robotic, CYA manner, devoid of enthusiasm. Her realization about them and their realization about her are asymmetric in consequence. Even if she judges them it won…
Re: Why is this idiot running my engineering org?
#124Sorry, the story totally lost me after she was describing the interaction with the FBI. I did not easily take away some conclusion about what she had done wrong or what deep pile of shit she had just created for herself, or what on 2 paths she had just chosen incorrectly, or daringly? (The paragraph ending, "I trusted the FBI to be good at their jobs." The next paragraph jumps right to generalizations, and I didn't c…
I think she's saying that it's odd to her, as someone who innately enjoys doing highly consequential work, that other people don't share in her enthusiasm. Similarly, coworkers must find it odd that she doesn't actively dodge such work or deal with it in a robotic, CYA manner, devoid of enthusiasm. Her realization about them and their realization about her are asymmetric in consequence. Even if she judges them it won…
Re: Why is this idiot running my engineering org?
#125I feel like the author is really clueless and has never worked in a startup.
You can't not get work done and survive in a startup. There's too much visibility into who is doing what to hide. That's not true in the US Government. I've met lots of losers in government who haven't done a bit of useful work in years.
The whole story seems like a concocted ... "oh look how badass and cool I am" scenario. The author is so full of herself.
Re: Why is this idiot running my engineering org?
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes. I was horrified at the point of: > ...he closes the door and takes out his badge. “I have to show you this first.” This job is not near the level of encountering FBI interviews as an actually critical part of work. "How about we circle back when I have legal counsel present" is the least perilous interaction at this point. > “Oh wait, I forgot something. Could you raise your right hand for a minute?” Confused. I…
Always lawyer up. As we’ve learned in the last few years, the FBI loves to catch people “lying” to agents as a precursor to persecuting them for political reasons.
Unless you are sitting on some real family wealth this idea that you can just "lawyer up" against the friggin' FBI is just laughable. Might as well advise people to "always call the president and get him on side".
"Always"! Like it's checking tire pressure before a long drive or something. "Oh yeah I always bring a couple of $1000/hr lawyers with me to important meetings. Better safe than sorry. What, you don't?"
Re: Why is this idiot running my engineering org?
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
> She has a manager who (apparently) has a low tolerance for risk. He probably got to where he is by spinning situations so that it's not his fault. He was upset that she contacted the FBI about a situation and took on more risk than he was comfortable with. I get that this appears to be the conclusion the author wants you to draw. But what's missing, to me, is that she has provided no evidence whatever to support it…
The missing piece of the puzzle is that we never meet the idiot manager in the story. She's in an organizational situation where her team has oversight over a team in the government implementing on a project but does not have the ability to directly set policy, constrain goals, or otherwise apply direct managerial leverage. The idiot in the story is the guy charging full speed ahead with a deployment of a product tha…
>the software was compromised by domestic terrorists and the threat was real
The missing piece to me is that she says, specifically, that it was under attack by white supremacists.
If you know anything about WS types, they are profoundly anti-intellectual. Anyone who has the technical chops to compromise software would almost certainly be labeled a secret jew/antifa/etc. Frankly I find "white supremacists threatening to hack my unreleased federal platform" as absurd as Budweiser claiming mormons are going to steal their trade secrets.
Perhaps the reason her zeal was encountered with groans is not that she is brave and strong but rather because she made a mistake, and now procedure requires people to go through tedious motions. They groan because in the public sector they can't simply sack her for incompetence. From what she writes of Matt's response, she completely misinterprets things like this all the time.
I posit that this is a natural reaction of ordinary people to a woman who is simply not capable of interpreting reality correctly. No doubt the FBI will agree, and she will claim they are some secret sympathizers. Her boss is an idiot, the fbi are secret terrorists, the list will pile high to the sky. People like her live their whole lives never encountering reality.
Re: Why is this idiot running my engineering org?
#128> Fleeing death doesn’t just hurt the people they throw under the bus, it also hurts them. They want to be respected by their employees and often know they are not. They want to be admired and often know they are not. They also feel guilty screwing people over to survive. Wow, I never considered there must exist some people who know they are bad at their job, feel bad about it, and yet have to continue doing it to ke…
Re: Why is this idiot running my engineering org?
#129>The end result of this is that it often feels like everyone at the top is maliciously incompetent. What's really going on is that a torrent of digital change is being unleashed on the world. That change is significantly changing the skills needed by leaders. I'm not sure if the flood of wildly successful leaders having a technical background is correlation or causation, but I am looking forward to knowing someday.
I share your opinion, but I think the digital change leads to more data-driven decision-making which in turn tends to highlight where nothing is actually getting done. In effect, digital change exposes the people who like big titles but don't actually like doing anything. In my personal opinion, this is also why those people prefer voice chats over written or recorded communication. When proof of work is open and tra…
Re: Why is this idiot running my engineering org?
#130Bureaucrats are drawn to startups? What? I feel like the author is really clueless and has never worked in a startup. You can't not get work done and survive in a startup. There's too much visibility into who is doing what to hide. That's not true in the US Government. I've met lots of losers in government who haven't done a bit of useful work in years. The whole story seems like a concocted ... "oh look how badass a…
There's the startup that's 50-100 people or smaller. In that case, you're completely right.
Then there's the "startup" that employs thousands of people and just closed a Series D in anticipation of hiring more.
The second is still a completely different beast from old stalwarts of industry like IBM, GM, big Wall Street banks, etc.