Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's off-topic: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
I disagree, based on the same evidence you've linked.
Large explosion in Beirut
31–40 of 43 posts
Re: Large explosion in Beirut
#32Another angle of the explosion - https://twitter.com/FadyRoumieh/status/1290672517733064705
Re: Large explosion in Beirut
#33Unconfirmed reports that a fireworks depot fire caused a secondary benzene explosion. src: https://twitter.com/mattparlmer/status/1290679715892690945
Re: Large explosion in Beirut
#34Anyone know why this has been flagged?
This seems ideal as an HN post to me - generating fruitful discussion and bringing in various viewpoints and areas of expertise. And the fact that it's a current event means that people have a bit of leeway in speculation: we all have the same limited source of information (on the ground video).
Re: Large explosion in Beirut
#35Unconfirmed reports that a fireworks depot fire caused a secondary benzene explosion. src: https://twitter.com/mattparlmer/status/1290679715892690945
That sounds plausible - it won’t be fireworks alone, black powder won’t make that kind of bang. Ammonium nitrate would fit the bill, too, which is the sort of thing you often have in warehouses or bulk carriers in quantities that would make an explosion of that order. Honestly, it’s somewhat amazing that this kind of thing doesn’t happen far more often than the ~1 incident per year, globally.
[0]https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/08/huge-explosion-rocks-...
Re: Large explosion in Beirut
#36What was that red material?
This is what I've been trying to work out, but am having problems Googling for suggestions. The only things I've in the past read as causing red smoke are highly carcinogenic/toxic hypergolic rocket fuels (hydrazine?), but I'm having a hard time imagining anyone storing a cache of that sort of thing anywhere near a built-up area. The form of the explosion here points in my mind to something significantly more explosi…
Re: Large explosion in Beirut
#37Unconfirmed reports that a fireworks depot fire caused a secondary benzene explosion. src: https://twitter.com/mattparlmer/status/1290679715892690945
I’ve also seen reports of grain silos in the area being destroyed; grain is an astonishingly powerful explosive.
They were in a tough spot already before this happened :-/
Re: Large explosion in Beirut
#38Re: Large explosion in Beirut
#39What was that red material?
This is what I've been trying to work out, but am having problems Googling for suggestions. The only things I've in the past read as causing red smoke are highly carcinogenic/toxic hypergolic rocket fuels (hydrazine?), but I'm having a hard time imagining anyone storing a cache of that sort of thing anywhere near a built-up area. The form of the explosion here points in my mind to something significantly more explosi…
Re: Large explosion in Beirut
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is what I've been trying to work out, but am having problems Googling for suggestions. The only things I've in the past read as causing red smoke are highly carcinogenic/toxic hypergolic rocket fuels (hydrazine?), but I'm having a hard time imagining anyone storing a cache of that sort of thing anywhere near a built-up area. The form of the explosion here points in my mind to something significantly more explosi…
I've read a number of reports saying that there was a large amount of sodium nitrate stored at the port (some sources say ammonium nitrate).
This kind of unnerves me a little.
Seemingly, a couple of tons of this not-entirely-impossible-to-get-ahold-of-chemical could seriously screw up national infrastructure.
We've had decades of fairly organised terrorism here in the UK, so perhaps I should know better, but it's a bit of a shock to realise that a 'manageable' quantity of otherwise fairly standard chemical stock is capable of producing something as dramatic as this.