Live data from Hacker News

NASA Astronauts Return Home in SpaceX's Crew Dragon Spacecraft [video]

youtube.com

11–20 of 104 posts

Re: NASA Astronauts Return Home in SpaceX's Crew Dragon Spacecraft [video]

#11

The first comment I saw in the live chat was "You people have it wrong, space is flat, not earth".

Well from what I’ve read the observable universe is fairly flat, but I was wondering what if we’re just living in a basin or on a plateau that extends beyond our observable reach? I suck at math though so I’ll just wait for theoretical astrophysicists to tell me interesting things on blogs.

I’ve always pondered a mobius strip with a river-like motion .

Re: NASA Astronauts Return Home in SpaceX's Crew Dragon Spacecraft [video]

#12

The first comment I saw in the live chat was "You people have it wrong, space is flat, not earth".

Well from what I’ve read the observable universe is fairly flat, but I was wondering what if we’re just living in a basin or on a plateau that extends beyond our observable reach? I suck at math though so I’ll just wait for theoretical astrophysicists to tell me interesting things on blogs.

Then we can all say we live "in the Valley"!

Re: NASA Astronauts Return Home in SpaceX's Crew Dragon Spacecraft [video]

#13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well from what I’ve read the observable universe is fairly flat, but I was wondering what if we’re just living in a basin or on a plateau that extends beyond our observable reach? I suck at math though so I’ll just wait for theoretical astrophysicists to tell me interesting things on blogs.

Then we can all say we live "in the Valley"!

We all live in the valley on this blessed day

Re: NASA Astronauts Return Home in SpaceX's Crew Dragon Spacecraft [video]

#15
post #3

Not yet, not until re-entry. It's arguably the most dangerous part of the missions since launching on Falcon 9 has happened many times before. Both Soyuz and the Space Shuttle had fatal accidents on re-entry.

You're not wrong, but I think it's cool how much safer the generic capsule design is than something like the Shuttle. Really the Shuttle got a whole lot wrong—heat-intolerant aluminum structure and critical, sensitive machinery directly beneath a layer of tiles so fragile you can crush them in your hands (IIRC).

SpaceX's Starship will probably be a lot more tolerant to defects in the heat shield because of the relatively heat-tolerant steel underneath, but landing safely relies on the operation of massive aero surfaces and a relight of the engines with thrust vectoring. It'll be interesting to see how that goes.

Post reply on HN