Live data from Hacker News

Trump says he will ban TikTok through executive action

cnbc.com

641–650 of 694 posts

Re: Trump says he will ban TikTok through executive action

#641

This will be a huge gift horse to Zuckerberg/Facebook and I have a sneaking suspicion it's a project of Peter Thiel. There are a lot of remedies that could be taken if we suspect TikTok of malfeasance, but a straight up ban? I smell fish.

"Peter Thiel sells most of remaining Facebook stake (2017)" https://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-stake/peter-thie...

He’s still on the board and is a friend of Zuck.

Re: Trump says he will ban TikTok through executive action

#642

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just consider the HUGE conflict of interest if an Facebook board member, and Trump inner circle confidant, had any input into this process.

where is the conflict? facebook is an america company so the president would be acting in the interest of an american company

The conflict is the presidents advisor sitting on the board of the company most likely to benefit from the ban.

Re: Trump says he will ban TikTok through executive action

#643

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> As for people dying due to lack of healthcare and you not counting it, if we're going to attribute the evils of CCP to "communism", why discount deaths attributable to "capitalism" so easily? Because the deaths aren’t attributable to capitalism. Capitalism has increased longevity all over the world, including in China. In China, it not only made medical advancements available to the Chinese, but China’s recent pros…

> Failing to provide top notch healthcare to a country’s citizens is a much less grave offense than outright murdering millions of citizens to protect or extend one’s political power. It's fair to say it's not as bad as doing it for political power, but it's worth noting that in the U.S. aprox. 45000 people a year die due to lack of adequate healthcare. Over the past 4-6 decades, it indeed ads up to millions dead. Th…

> You have a much more direct impact on the U.S. and making it better than you have on China. Diluting yourself into thinking the U.S. is already essentially "the good guys" prevents you from having the will to actively improve it and over time leads to the fact of it being not as far from China as you'd like.

You’re mistaken, I have little difficulty in acknowledging America’s faults and focusing on improving them. I can simultaneously acknowledge that the US has considerable room for improvement without needing to pretend like our deficiencies are comparable to Chinese deficiencies, and indeed if one’s goal is to encourage Americans to improve, why drag in a China comparison at all? I don’t think Americans need to be diluted into thinking that we are only a little better than China in order to improve; in fact, I don’t think our motivation for improvement should be predicated on a China comparison at all. I think these kinds of nonsense comparisons are an impediment to improvement.

Re: Trump says he will ban TikTok through executive action

#644
post #418

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He cleaned up in 2008.

Also not really a black swan event. Plenty of people saw the crash coming. Just not economists or regulators or real estate shills.

Lol... then it wouldn’t have happened!

Re: Trump says he will ban TikTok through executive action

#645

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You replied with nonsense. The fact is China is good at one thing: ripping off other countries inventions. Name one high tech thing in the last 1,000 years invented in China - no, not iteration, but INVENTED. Since gunpowder, China has stagnated.

Synthetic bovine insulin, 1965.

That isn't really "high tech", it's organic chemistry. We can split hairs about the meaning of "high tech" but that would be pointless.

Re: Trump says he will ban TikTok through executive action

#646

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Failing to provide top notch healthcare to a country’s citizens is a much less grave offense than outright murdering millions of citizens to protect or extend one’s political power. It's fair to say it's not as bad as doing it for political power, but it's worth noting that in the U.S. aprox. 45000 people a year die due to lack of adequate healthcare. Over the past 4-6 decades, it indeed ads up to millions dead. Th…

> You have a much more direct impact on the U.S. and making it better than you have on China. Diluting yourself into thinking the U.S. is already essentially "the good guys" prevents you from having the will to actively improve it and over time leads to the fact of it being not as far from China as you'd like. You’re mistaken, I have little difficulty in acknowledging America’s faults and focusing on improving them.…

> You’re mistaken, I have little difficulty in acknowledging America’s faults and focusing on improving them.

You haven't acknowledged a single one so far. You simply brush them as "I don't think the U.S. has killed millions of civilians within living memory" (it has), or the lack of healthcare is somehow not a direct consequence of capitalism in a sector that shouldn't be for profit (it is).

Everyone can say they can acknowledge faults, without actually acknowledging any.

> I can simultaneously acknowledge that the US has considerable room for improvement without needing to pretend like our deficiencies are comparable to Chinese deficiencies.

Again, I am not making the argument it is comparable, just that it's probably closer than people like you like to tell themselves it is.

> why drag in a China comparison at all?

Because this is a topic about America closing its markets to a Chinese company maybe?

The U.S. waged many imperialist wars in order to force open markets in various countries around the world to its exports. So it is indeed very ironic that now this aggressive proponent of "free market" is closing their own.

There are also disturbing points of comparison considering the U.S. is a democracy, like its slave prison labor for example.

I am coming at this as an European with an outside perspective. My life is far more directly impacted by the shit America does than China. And the U.S. does a lot of shit in terms of its foreign policy. It seems to me like your view of how the U.S. is perceived is colored by how American media says the world perceives America, rather than the reality.

Yes, the ideal of America is great, but the reality is far from the ideal and just looking at its handling of the current pandemic does not paint a pretty picture.

So agree to disagree, overall still better, sure, just not by as much as Americans seem to think, especially if you consider that the current U.S. "regime" is a lot older than China's current system and had a lot longer to stabilize, get confident and as a result a lot more peaceful.

If we were to include its entire history, including the history of slavery, it would indeed be the much worse party.

As I said, not a fan of the CCP and think it has fascistic tendencies, but the tales America likes to tell itself of how moral it is are honestly a bit delusional.

I don't think this discussion is going any further.

Re: Trump says he will ban TikTok through executive action

#647
post #585

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is a risk of a walled garden like iOS. There's always the web. Good luck banning a website.

In France they use lying DNS. Most of the users have their default DNS set up: the ISP ones, and the french ISP dns' must comply to the law. If you want to access SciHub for exemple, you need to change your DNS config to something else.

> change your DNS config to something else

Trivial

Re: Trump says he will ban TikTok through executive action

#648
post #585

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In France they use lying DNS. Most of the users have their default DNS set up: the ISP ones, and the french ISP dns' must comply to the law. If you want to access SciHub for exemple, you need to change your DNS config to something else.

> change your DNS config to something else Trivial

Oh yes, but most of the people doesn't know, so it's effective.

Re: Trump says he will ban TikTok through executive action

#649

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From a native Chinese’s perspective, this is scary: what’s the next thing he will ban? - Wechat: this make a virtual “family separation” - A purge of any app related to China (TuSimple, Zoom etc) - Suspend F1 and H1B visa for “suspected” Chinese and make special scrutiny during immigration interviews for all Chinese applicants - witch hunt more Let me tell you what’s this: Chinese Exclusion Act II

What's wrong with banning WeChat? China bans WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and a whole other bunch of apps. Zoom should be scrutinized very heavily and potentially banned as well. Keep in mind China bans Skype.

Zoom’s founder is of Chinese origin but it entirely US based from the beginning.

Re: Trump says he will ban TikTok through executive action

#650
I don't believe Trump's banning TikTok because of its Chinese connections.

I think this is a retalitory action because of its use to mess with his reelection. Brad Pascale got demoted over the Tulsa debacle and this is Trump's way to get back at the TikTok users.

While checking my facts, I noticed someone at Forbes was also thinking that its only about Trump as usual and put together a timeline.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/abrambrown/2020/08/01/is-this-t...

Post reply on HN