Also should any repercussions be considered against Twitter that a 17yo was able to gain access to the private messages of potentially some of the most important individuals in the world?
If a 17yo could do it, I'm sure a nation state could do it.
131–140 of 702 posts
Also should any repercussions be considered against Twitter that a 17yo was able to gain access to the private messages of potentially some of the most important individuals in the world?
If a 17yo could do it, I'm sure a nation state could do it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[cost of compliance] > [revenue from EU visitors]
And I don't blame the site at all. Another stupid rule from the EU preventing me from reading articles.
You may find this site helpful
"Our European visitors are important to us. This site is currently unavailable to visitors from the European Economic Area while we work to ensure your data is protected in accordance with applicable EU laws." nice
Why do all these prompts use doublespeak so blatantly? It's actually insane. "Your privacy matters to us." -> Then why are you asking me to give it up? If my privacy mattered to you you wouldn't even ask to install tracking cookies and gather my data.
> Today’s announcement proves that cybercriminals can no longer hide behind perceived global anonymity Anyone know what the loose end was that got these guys busted?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And I don't blame the site at all. Another stupid rule from the EU preventing me from reading articles.
https://outline.com/ You may find this site helpful
another option
> Today’s announcement proves that cybercriminals can no longer hide behind perceived global anonymity Anyone know what the loose end was that got these guys busted?
ThorSquint.jpeg
I'd love to know as well.
Hitting a 17yo with 30 felony charges feels a bit steep to me. Also should any repercussions be considered against Twitter that a 17yo was able to gain access to the private messages of potentially some of the most important individuals in the world? If a 17yo could do it, I'm sure a nation state could do it.
My thoughts go to the fact they were able to hunt someone down based on their bitcoin address. Either they got help, this kid was already being watched or it just speaks to the DOJs data collection to all citizens.
Hitting a 17yo with 30 felony charges feels a bit steep to me. Also should any repercussions be considered against Twitter that a 17yo was able to gain access to the private messages of potentially some of the most important individuals in the world? If a 17yo could do it, I'm sure a nation state could do it.
Hitting a 17yo with 30 felony charges feels a bit steep to me. Also should any repercussions be considered against Twitter that a 17yo was able to gain access to the private messages of potentially some of the most important individuals in the world? If a 17yo could do it, I'm sure a nation state could do it.