Does it really matter that he's a "Microsoft Engineer" or is that just thrown in there to ruffle old people's feathers?
But the article is lazy and doesn't mention why it's important, so we're all going to infer something different about it.
11–20 of 39 posts
Does it really matter that he's a "Microsoft Engineer" or is that just thrown in there to ruffle old people's feathers?
But the article is lazy and doesn't mention why it's important, so we're all going to infer something different about it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/28/640
Who would thought, years ago, seeing an email address "@linux.microsoft.com"?
"We're getting ignored in the mailing lists. What can we do about it?"
Does it really matter that he's a "Microsoft Engineer" or is that just thrown in there to ruffle old people's feathers?
Does it really matter that he's a "Microsoft Engineer" or is that just thrown in there to ruffle old people's feathers?
[1] https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Intel-Bu...
[2] https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Google-Z...
[3] https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=L1d-Cach...
Someone in the Phoronix comments wondered why not just map it (the kernel-assisted trampoline memory page) executable and not writeable, to avoid the attack surface but be significantly faster. I also wonder exactly why, admittedly I haven’t read the mailing list thread entirely but purely working on theory I wonder what the advantages of working on page fault is. Less abusable gadgets in memory? More flexibility? Pe…
Currently the page must be writeable at some point in order to create the trampoline. A page fault is used as a way of executing the trampoline without the page having to be made executable/writable---the page fault handler recognises the page as a special trampoline page and handles the jump to the trampolines target address (which was previously registered using the new syscall). Note that AFAICS this is unrelated…
Does it really matter that he's a "Microsoft Engineer" or is that just thrown in there to ruffle old people's feathers?
For example, since Alyssa Rosenzweig writes full-length articles about her and others' work on Mesa drivers for Mali GPUs, she is mentioned in article titles or in main paragraphs, or Collabora is mentioned.
Michael also covers interesting hires and organizational changes, like Valve hiring another developer for RADV this week, Valve is prominent in the title because it is important social information.
Someone in the Phoronix comments wondered why not just map it (the kernel-assisted trampoline memory page) executable and not writeable, to avoid the attack surface but be significantly faster. I also wonder exactly why, admittedly I haven’t read the mailing list thread entirely but purely working on theory I wonder what the advantages of working on page fault is. Less abusable gadgets in memory? More flexibility? Pe…
I'm guessing, the charitable version could be that the implementation on a major processor vendor works out to be just the right amount of security because the page fault handler wasn't optimized as heavily as the syscall interface. So, this might provide better security on a "slower" path, which turns out to actually be faster once the faster path is fully secured?
Someone in the Phoronix comments wondered why not just map it (the kernel-assisted trampoline memory page) executable and not writeable, to avoid the attack surface but be significantly faster. I also wonder exactly why, admittedly I haven’t read the mailing list thread entirely but purely working on theory I wonder what the advantages of working on page fault is. Less abusable gadgets in memory? More flexibility? Pe…