Smartphone contact tracing has failed everywhere • Hacker News Board

Re: Smartphone contact tracing has failed everywhere

#201

Post by azinman2 » Wed, Jul 29, 2020, 11:34 PM UTC

anoncake wrote: post #200

azinman2 wrote: post #199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-07-covid-related-symptom... A Google search will yield many results. It’s not hard to find.

So you can't. Got it.

I literally provided a link to you showing exactly that. Did you not read it? But I'll feed the troll, why not:

https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/07/two-months-after-inf...

https://www.prevention.com/health/a33432800/long-term-covid-...

https://www.healthrising.org/blog/2020/07/24/open-letter-cov...

https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/health/2020/07/25/cov...

https://health.clevelandclinic.org/what-it-means-to-be-a-cor...

https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2020/06/09/long-haul...

https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2020/07/21/covid-19-long-hau...

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-07-tail-coronavirus-prol...

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/covid-19-long-hau...

https://www.today.com/health/covid-19-long-haulers-doctor-ta...

Satisfied now?

Re: Smartphone contact tracing has failed everywhere

#202

Post by anoncake » Fri, Jul 31, 2020, 9:32 AM UTC

azinman2 wrote: post #201

anoncake wrote: post #200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So you can't. Got it.

I literally provided a link to you showing exactly that. Did you not read it? But I'll feed the troll, why not: https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/07/two-months-after-inf... https://www.prevention.com/health/a33432800/long-term-covid-... https://www.healthrising.org/blog/2020/07/24/open-letter-cov... https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/health/2020/07/25/cov... https://health.clevelandclinic.org/what-it-means-to-…

10 articles of anecdotes are just as worthless as 1.

Re: Smartphone contact tracing has failed everywhere

#203

Post by azinman2 » Fri, Jul 31, 2020, 6:04 PM UTC

anoncake wrote: post #202

azinman2 wrote: post #201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I literally provided a link to you showing exactly that. Did you not read it? But I'll feed the troll, why not: https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/07/two-months-after-inf... https://www.prevention.com/health/a33432800/long-term-covid-... https://www.healthrising.org/blog/2020/07/24/open-letter-cov... https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/health/2020/07/25/cov... https://health.clevelandclinic.org/what-it-means-to-…

10 articles of anecdotes are just as worthless as 1.

The Rome study linked was 143 people, not 10. It seems like you’re moving the goal posts. You said you can’t produce one, I originally did and followed up with many more. Then you say that’s worthless, which means you didn’t even read those links. You’re not discussing things in good faith, which is a violation of the norms here in HN.

We saw the same pattern with far bigger studies with SARS. The fact of the matter is this is all very new, and conclusive data will take time. But there’s plenty of evidence already to suggest that for some it behaves like SARS and that’s very concerning. We also don’t know if this will behave like herpes or chickenpox and cause problems later in life even for those who “recovered.” There’s a reason why the world world is taking this seriously.

Re: Smartphone contact tracing has failed everywhere

#204

Post by anoncake » Sun, Aug 02, 2020, 8:36 PM UTC

azinman2 wrote: post #203

anoncake wrote: post #202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

10 articles of anecdotes are just as worthless as 1.

The Rome study linked was 143 people, not 10. It seems like you’re moving the goal posts. You said you can’t produce one, I originally did and followed up with many more. Then you say that’s worthless, which means you didn’t even read those links. You’re not discussing things in good faith, which is a violation of the norms here in HN. We saw the same pattern with far bigger studies with SARS. The fact of the matter…

Right, I didn't read all those links. I checked one at random, saw it's anecdotal bullshit and decided not to sift through the rest in the hope there could be something valuable in there.

But hey, spamming links is a step up from "Google yourself, there's plenty of evidence [I don't bother to cite].