Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same here, they used to but stopped about a year ago.
Ditto. Helping some non-profits, we were really hurt by people typo-ing a $10,000 donation when they meant to only donate $100. We quickly learned from that mistake. We also learned about how credit card thieves test credit cards. We saw hundreds of donation attempts. Stripe had us refund those that went threw, which costed us money in fees. Fortunately we were able to put some quick measures in place to stop them te…
When a customer refunds your paid app, Apple refunds its 30% cut [edited]
311–320 of 583 posts
Re: When a customer refunds your paid app, Apple refunds its 30% cut [edited]
#312Earlier quoted context omitted.
What if you have a big Twitter following and ask them to do it?
Sounds like a lawsuit in the making if the harm is great enough.
Re: When a customer refunds your paid app, Apple refunds its 30% cut [edited]
#313Apple is taking a cut for providing the store itself, distribution, visibility, SDKs/frameworks, etc. Why would they refund 30%?
Why would they refund 30%? Because they can afford it, and it's the right thing to do both ethically and morally.
Re: When a customer refunds your paid app, Apple refunds its 30% cut [edited]
#314Payment processors generally don't refund fees on payments when the payments are refunded, this isn't new. It's remarkable mainly because (a) it's 30%, not 3% and (b) the App store doesn't position itself as a payments processor the way Stripe does, so it sounds really weird that they would act like one. If the app store took a 3% chunk and never refunded it regardless of the ongoing status of the transaction, that w…
PayPal also keeps the fees when a refund is issued https://www.theverge.com/2019/9/20/20876570/paypal-refund-fe...
Re: When a customer refunds your paid app, Apple refunds its 30% cut [edited]
#315Apple is taking a cut for providing the store itself, distribution, visibility, SDKs/frameworks, etc. Why would they refund 30%?
Developers do have to pay an yearly fee to just be an iOS developer, so the argument that's because of the SDKs is incorrect
Re: When a customer refunds your paid app, Apple refunds its 30% cut [edited]
#316How long will they get away with this before antitrust regulation kicks in? They are so focused on extracting rent that they keep on poking this sleeping bear, and it eventually will be a huge problem for them. If they don’t reverse course, expect to see large reductions in their profits and stock price when this happens.
Re: When a customer refunds your paid app, Apple refunds its 30% cut [edited]
#317Purchase: Customer pays $10. Apple keeps $3. Developer gets $7 Refund should be: Developer has $7 deducted from current owed "royalties" Apple refunds $10 to the customer. Is Apple actually taking $10 from the developer and giving it to the customer? That would be theft. The developer is not obligated to cover refunds beyond the profit/royalty they originally made on it.
Frankly from my point of view this is criminal. We kept payments for our product outside the app for years, and now Apple closes that ability too, by forcing any app that accepts payments of any kind to also accept Apple Pay. We've had to basically hide the ability to find it in the app so that people will go to the website first.
Apple seriously needs to be regulated.
Re: When a customer refunds your paid app, Apple refunds its 30% cut [edited]
#318I am using the term in a colloiquial, non-legalistic sense.
My fear is that politicians are invested in tech stocks, like the rest of us and pretty much anyone with a mutual fund, so they are unlikely to act in a pro-consumer manner.
Re: When a customer refunds your paid app, Apple refunds its 30% cut [edited]
#319Apple is taking a cut for providing the store itself, distribution, visibility, SDKs/frameworks, etc. Why would they refund 30%?
Perhaps the refund is caused by the store itself? Is it inconceivable that the distribution, visibility and framework caused the customer to misjudge the product?