Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Offline video call via HDMI cables

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 11 posts

Ask HN: Offline video call via HDMI cables

#1
Our conditions force us to make video call between 2 rooms almost every day for learning and teaching.

We don't have a good Internet connection here.

However, we do have 2 long HDMI cables, 2 HDMI TV, 2 laptops.

So we are trying a very simple approach that is just connecting them like the following illustration.

Room A Computer ]-- HDMI Cable --> Room B TV

Room A TV Then on the 2 laptops, we just use a simple WebRTC like this one:

https://webrtc.github.io/samples/src/content/devices/input-output/

to stream the video & voice call to each other.

The WebRTC does have echo problems with computer built in microphone.

So my question is:

Does any free/open source offline software that can handle this streaming task better then WebRTC, or do you have any suggestions?

(PS: We have Ubuntu OS computers. Just in case, we can also borrow Mac computers).

Thanks HN.

Re: Ask HN: Offline video call via HDMI cables

#6
post #3

or a 30m ethernet cabel from PC1/room1 to floor to PC2/room2 keep it simpel

Thanks Derane, Most of the tutorials I found only show how to share data between 2 computers via Ethernet cable. Like this one:

https://www.wikihow.com/Connect-Two-Computers-Together-with-...

For real time video call (Offline), it is not easy. I tried Linphone etc...

Re: Ask HN: Offline video call via HDMI cables

#8
Since you already have an HDMI connection, just extend the display of Room A computer, use OBS or whichever software to fill the screen with the webcam's image, and then monitor your microphone on the HDMI audio output (in Windows this is the "listen to" option), causing the microphone to be output by the TV.

Re: Ask HN: Offline video call via HDMI cables

#10

I fail to see why you need a computer for this; you can just connect a camera and microphone directly to the TV set (or VCR, if you want to record it, I suppose) in the other room, and then just do that both ways.

Dear ZZo38computer, Yes, this is a very good solution. We thought about this too. However, we could not do here because we do not have all such things. Thanks ZZo38computer
Post reply on HN