Earlier quoted context omitted.
You also can't get firmware updates if you don't install the companion app and allow them to spy on you.
which is why bose for example only let you configure noise cancelling through the app.
Headphones are collecting too much personal data (2019)
41–50 of 431 posts
Re: Headphones are collecting too much personal data (2019)
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't this really only an issue if you use the companion app? I doubt the usb-c/lightning/bluetooth headphones can exfiltrate data if you don't have the companion app installed.
You also can't get firmware updates if you don't install the companion app and allow them to spy on you.
Not just Bose, the Sony WH* series is also guilty of this. Great cans, awful app.
Re: Headphones are collecting too much personal data (2019)
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
You also can't get firmware updates if you don't install the companion app and allow them to spy on you.
which is why bose for example only let you configure noise cancelling through the app.
Re: Headphones are collecting too much personal data (2019)
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
You also can't get firmware updates if you don't install the companion app and allow them to spy on you.
Why do my headphones need firmware updates? Presumably they work fine at purchase.
Re: Headphones are collecting too much personal data (2019)
#45Only a slightly related tangent, but most headphones and other loudspeakers can be very effective microphones when wired into the right circuit. While speakers are often wired directly to a one-way DAC, that's not always the case. Sometimes the analog lines are all fed into a multiplexer and it can be routed to a ADC. Sometimes it's wired to a general purpose IO pin. In such cases, reprogramming could turn that speak…
Re: Headphones are collecting too much personal data (2019)
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've seen this comment or a variation on it a thousand times now and it is getting boring. Just like all the other times: please comment on the message rather than on the means of delivery, finding pages without social media embeds is becoming more and more rare and besides that the party writing the article content may not have control over that particular aspect. But that doesn't mean they don't have a point.
They author may not be able to control the social media embeds of this particular site, but they certainly have control over where the choose to publish. I see nothing wrong with taking them to task for this sort of hypocrisy.
Anyway, seeing the same comment over and over again reduces its value. It was a cool observation the first time, boring the second, redundant after that.
Re: Headphones are collecting too much personal data (2019)
#47Re: Personal fitness and menstruation history - Is that shocking? They're earbuds, but they're marketed as fitness buds that track personal data. It looks like Fitbit for your ears. Fitbit and Apple Health (or whatever it is called) does these kinds of things as well. Re: Bose collecting all that stuff I can see "why" they would want all that, in order to optimize their sound output of their buds to the kind of music…
I bought headphones, I did not sign up for a research project.
We went from paying for software to getting it for free in return for our data and now we're apparently giving over our data even for physical devices that we pay top dollar for.
Re: Headphones are collecting too much personal data (2019)
#48Re: Headphones are collecting too much personal data (2019)
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
You also can't get firmware updates if you don't install the companion app and allow them to spy on you.
which is why bose for example only let you configure noise cancelling through the app.
Re: Headphones are collecting too much personal data (2019)
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
There were two things that happened when Apple got rid of the headphone jack: (1) they added water resistance, (2) the phones got thinner. Plus, Apple had seen the trends heading toward wireless headphones. They still included a dongle to give you a standard headphone jack. While Apple could likely have gotten their water resistance even with the headphone jack, they couldn’t have made the phones as thin. People may…
> the phones got thinner No. They didn't. iPhone 5: 7.6 mm thin, 6: 7 mm iPhone 7: 7.1 mm > While Apple could likely have gotten their water resistance even with the headphone jack, they couldn’t have made the phones as thin. Except that's a pretty obvious lie. Not just that the phones did not get thinner (or lighter), they stayed around the same thickness (+- 0.5 mm), while getting larger, much heavier and much more…
It looks like the reason most cited, in hindsight, for Apple removing it was to pave the way for a design without bezels and with more speakers
https://screenrant.com/why-apple-removed-the-headphone/ https://bgr.com/2017/10/06/pixel-2-headphone-jack-iphone-x-d...
Which is, indeed, a very different reason.