Live data from Hacker News

Building an Offline Page for Theguardian.com

theguardian.com

11–13 of 13 posts

Re: Building an Offline Page for Theguardian.com

#13
post #10

I am not up to date on this kind of technology, but reading the article, this sound terrible! Not the guardians implementation, but the concept of locally "caching", though I would call it installing, executable code, that can then intercept network requests and basically do whatever it wants? Why would we think this is a good idea? I am not surprised by Chrome doing something like this. But firefox too? I hope this…

It can't do whatever it wants. It can make responses for requests that would go to that particular website without actually making the request, that's it - that is, the website can provide some code that makes local responses on its behalf for things it could respond to anyway . It can't intercept (or even see) anything for other sites. That's a significant difference from installing executable code in the form of a…

There's also the original pre-web Gopher protocol, which has been getting a lot more users since being mentioned on HN a few weeks ago together with Gemini. Gopher seems to appeal to people who like retro-computing - the TLS requirement of Gemini rules out even older Macs, nevermind the Apple IIs and Commodore 64s that can still access Gopher.

For anyone curious, Phetch is a really good terminal-based browser for Gopher written in Rust [1], and Jaruzel's Gopher Browser For Windows is a very easy to use GUI browser that also supports image files. Both are under 1MB. (If you're running Haiku OS, Gopher is still built-in to the default WebPositive browser.)

[1] https://github.com/xvxx/phetch

[2] http://www.jaruzel.com/gopher/gopher-client-browser-for-wind...

Post reply on HN