Live data from Hacker News

Put tiny businesses back into residential neighborhoods

fastcompany.com

411–420 of 427 posts

Re: Put tiny businesses back into residential neighborhoods

#411

Earlier quoted context omitted.

...walking on rural roads at night where there is no footpath is horrendously dangerous... Do you have to walk on the road? One might have expected that in rural areas one could walk through fields and forests.

The context here is UK rural areas which are not quite like other places. Imagine a road that can fit 1 car, with wider places every few hundred metres and 2m+ hedges on both sides, immediately next to the road. Apart from specific paths you can't really go into a field. Random example https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/narrow-road-high-hedge-18153... Not all counties will look like that, but quite a lot of them to. Ima…

> You really don't want to walk them at night.

I used to walk such roads at night.

I was taught, to keep safe:

- Carry a torch (flashlight outside the UK ;-) with good batteries, and don't wear dark clothing. Turn on the torch when you see headlights in the distance, make sure it's pointing somewhere visible.

- Walk on the right-hand side of the road (cars drive on the left in the UK). It's marginal on single-lane country roads but cars still tend towards their normal driving side. Better if you can see surprise vehicles coming towards you rather than from behind you, and they can see you facing them.

- Wear retro-reflective clothing / strips if possible.

As long as cars can see you, they slow down to pass just as they will for a car driving in the opposite direction. Which at night they first recognise by headlights, from quite far away and around corners, so light is what they're looking out for.

Definitely don't be dark, as that makes you invisible to cars at night until very close.

Re: Put tiny businesses back into residential neighborhoods

#412

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Some people actually like cars/driving I live in a small town but in a very spread out relatively densely populated country. Still with the closing of the old bakery and little grocery store due to the people who ran it retiring I have to go to a nearby city or supermarkets on the outskirts for stuff. I'm not saying this out of spite or annoyance because of that. It's not that far. Hell i'm even moving soon. But I d…

Yeah I wouldn't like driving to another city to do my errands either. I think the OP meant having a grocery store literally right next door to you

I think you have to be a lot more specific, perhaps make a map with distances for walk/bicycle/car and a list of concrete things you find yourself doing in every day life. For me I always find the these too long/another city can mean so many different things.

Re: Put tiny businesses back into residential neighborhoods

#413
post #353

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ah that's right, use-based zoning. I still don't see how removing all zoning would de facto make cities easier to get around in, particularly when the US has a long history of private interests working against public mobility projects. The reason Americans are so dependent on cars was largely influenced by big automakers.

I tend to think that the outcome of removing zoning in the US would be very case-by-case. In a desirable urban neighborhood with height restrictions and a historical building commission, it might be possible to add a lot more density and storefronts without zoning. On the other end, I don't think a developer would add a story to a suburban olive garden along a busy road. If anything it might be cheaper to build spraw…

> On the other end, I don't think a developer would add a story to a suburban olive garden along a busy road. If anything it might be cheaper to build sprawl without zoning.

I think this is exactly Houston’s situation and why it is such a disaster from a walkability standpoint.

Re: Put tiny businesses back into residential neighborhoods

#414

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Investors have proven willing to keep homes and apartments empty as well. The behavior seems bizarre to me, but it seems you have to set tax policies to discourage it.

If you are big enough theres some weird accounting incentive to keep it vacant. You can keep claiming it as an asset that brings in 10x dollars, even though your cash flow is 0x, so actually renting for 8x really hurts your asset value or some nonsense that im probably getting the details wrong about.

Real estate is its own beast.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/03/how-kle...

tl;dr: post 9/11 criminal money laundering activity switched from banks to real estate

Re: Put tiny businesses back into residential neighborhoods

#415

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah I wouldn't like driving to another city to do my errands either. I think the OP meant having a grocery store literally right next door to you

I think you have to be a lot more specific, perhaps make a map with distances for walk/bicycle/car and a list of concrete things you find yourself doing in every day life. For me I always find the these too long/another city can mean so many different things.

Yeah gp. When I said "another city", I meant more than 20 min away by car

Re: Put tiny businesses back into residential neighborhoods

#416

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Can anyone explain how the term "Karen" isn't both racist and sexist at the same time? Because it’s tied to behaviour. Stop behaving like an a-hole and you stop being called a Karen. You can’t stop being black or a woman. That’s the key difference.

> Because it’s tied to behaviour. We wouldn't call illegal gardeners a Hernandez, or terrorists from the middle east Mohammeds. Those are behaviors too. What makes it wrong is picking an ethnic name to associate with that behavior. Karen is a euphemism for suburban, white, female.

Except for the second part: you’ve never been discriminated against for being white.

The sexist part doesn’t really fit for me either, as we generally reserve insults for genders too. Bitch vs bastard are prime examples.

By the way, the male version of “Karen” in my part of the world is much worse.

Re: Put tiny businesses back into residential neighborhoods

#417
post #203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And misogyny apparently. Let's not pretend that all people like that are women.

Why do you assume its gender from its first name?

That smartass comment would work better if it made sense.

Re: Put tiny businesses back into residential neighborhoods

#418

Mixed use zoning is just about the best case situation for everyone. - Less reliance on cars, which results in less parking, which results in less traffic... it becomes self-perpetuating. - Better walkability - Knowing your corner store clerk or at least having a rapport with them - Healthier citizens, due to them walking everywhere (Go to NYC and see how few overweight people you see... not many unless they're touri…

As far as I can tell, "zoning" is just a bad idea. There's no such thing in the UK [1] and it still surprises me that it's quite a common approach. (As a kid I thought it was a game device employed to make urban planning in Sim City manageable. I still wonder if that series of games hasn't increased its prevalence.) Instead, in the UK you require 'planning permission' to change the land use of any building. This is d…

I remember being in mexico city, and in one neighborhood, they would talk about "las minas", which were mines, right next to and in a residential area. Most of the people in that area got their water for showers from groundwater.

be careful what you wish for.

Re: Put tiny businesses back into residential neighborhoods

#419

I currently live in New Orleans, which is very mixed-use if you're in the city proper. It's really, really nice. I bike everywhere. Groceries, bookstores, head shops, cafes, bars, hardware store (with a super nice housewares department on the second floor), plumbers, auto shops, restaurants, snoball stands, parks, schools[1], dentists, optometrists, lawyers, there's pretty much everything I need in a 20min cycling ra…

Yeah the state government is too poor and devoid of tax dollars, so they can’t do anything about that unfortunately.

Re: Put tiny businesses back into residential neighborhoods

#420
post #260

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem is, people used to have non-gender, non-racial terms for people. For example, a person might be called an 'asshole' or 'bonehead', and this could be a person of any colour, any sex, age, etc. Yet now, it seems all sorts are labeling people based upon sex, colour, ethnic background, etc. It is, quite literally, the definition of sexual, racial, age discrimination. It is linking "external characteristic" wi…

From what I understand the specific behavior is actually and intrinsically linked to the idea of a white woman in America and has historically existed for quite a while among black circles (from the 1800s at least). Discussing Karen as if it’s new belies the actual history of it. [0] 0. https://www.npr.org/2020/07/14/891177904/whats-in-a-karen

What a weird assertion, when you link to an article that asserts something entirely different.

The above NPR, states that a Karen is a new label, started in the 2010s (which is just last year, even). It also shows how the Karen label is different from other, prior labels.

It delineates how a Becky is different, a "Miss Ann" is different.

We've historically had labels like this for people, which are racially linked. But this is 2020, this is a NEW label, and other NEW labels keep popping up.

We need to collectively STOP this. No more racist, sexist, ageist, anything-ist labels. It's all wrong.

(Not saying you were defending label use... just clarifying my position)

Post reply on HN