Live data from Hacker News

Noprocrast (2010)

web.archive.org

11–20 of 108 posts

Re: Noprocrast (2010)

#11
Hacker News also has a noprocrast feature that’s designed to keep you away from the site for a while if you’ve been using the site for too long. It’s a little buggy with how it does detection, though, so I have it turned off.

Re: Noprocrast (2010)

#12
post #9

I have found few things as effective as shutting down my X server and just working in Emacs in the console. Obviously less useful if you're doing web stuff (although NetSurf exists).

Do you not have to search for things online usually?

Re: Noprocrast (2010)

#13
post #5

Can someone please help me with how to achieve the same thing on windows that works on any browser ? I tried some DNS blocking programs and can't get anything to work properly.

You can install NextDNS and use their blacklist feature to block distracting websites.

Re: Noprocrast (2010)

#14
post #9

I have found few things as effective as shutting down my X server and just working in Emacs in the console. Obviously less useful if you're doing web stuff (although NetSurf exists).

Do you not have to search for things online usually?

M-x eww.

(Then you discover M-x eww https://news.ycombinator.com, back to square one.)

Re: Noprocrast (2010)

#16
post #13
post #5

Can someone please help me with how to achieve the same thing on windows that works on any browser ? I tried some DNS blocking programs and can't get anything to work properly.

You can install NextDNS and use their blacklist feature to block distracting websites.

Seconded. This works really well.

Re: Noprocrast (2010)

#17
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you not have to search for things online usually?

M-x eww. (Then you discover M-x eww https://news.ycombinator.com , back to square one.)

It's painful enough that I don't use it for social stuff, but most programming documentation (and Stack Overflow etc) renders well enough that it's functional when you need it.

Re: Noprocrast (2010)

#20
Thanks for the catalyst to re-enable my /etc/hosts approach to simplifying my life.

I'm surprised to see that adding:

  127.0.0.1 youtube.com www.youtube.com
to /etc/hosts doesn't seem to block youtube, but every other line I added blocked/routed as expected. Is there something special about youtube and chromium?
Post reply on HN