Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you're using RAID-Z on zfs, your comparison isn't fair. Rather than use RAID56 with btrfs, the equivalent would be to get 1 or 2 disk redundancy with raid1 or raid1c3.
RAID-Z is the equivalent of RAID-5. RAID-Z2 is the equivalent of RAID-6. RAID-Z3 would be the equivalent of RAID-7 (or whatever the standard is named for 3-disk parity). This is strictly speaking to how it deals with data and parity, the implementations are obviously different. RAID-1 would be a mirror in ZFS parlance.
In Praise of ZFS on Linux's ZED 'ZFS Event Daemon'
121–124 of 124 posts
Re: In Praise of ZFS on Linux's ZED 'ZFS Event Daemon'
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you're using RAID-Z on zfs, your comparison isn't fair. Rather than use RAID56 with btrfs, the equivalent would be to get 1 or 2 disk redundancy with raid1 or raid1c3.
Not really - RAIDZ is basically RAID5 without the write hole problem. ZFS equivalent to RAID1 is called 'mirror', and is... well, a mirror.
Re: In Praise of ZFS on Linux's ZED 'ZFS Event Daemon'
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not really - RAIDZ is basically RAID5 without the write hole problem. ZFS equivalent to RAID1 is called 'mirror', and is... well, a mirror.
Yes, and btrfs's raid1 isn't a mirror. Btrfs's raid1c3 and raid1c4 are its alternative to raid5/6 without the write hole.
Re: In Praise of ZFS on Linux's ZED 'ZFS Event Daemon'
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not really - RAIDZ is basically RAID5 without the write hole problem. ZFS equivalent to RAID1 is called 'mirror', and is... well, a mirror.
Yes, and btrfs's raid1 isn't a mirror. Btrfs's raid1c3 and raid1c4 are its alternative to raid5/6 without the write hole.