Live data from Hacker News

You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

qntm.org

101–110 of 164 posts

Re: You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

#101
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> 2020 is the beginning of a decade, because colloquially it's easier and understandable But 2020 is technically the start of a decade, not just informally.

Well, technically every day is the start of a decade.

No that's what it informally means. Technically, decades start on the first day of a ...0 year, so not all days are the start of a decade.

Re: You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And yet people will say that 2000 is the beginning of the millenium, and 2020 is the beginning of a decade, because colloquially it's easier and understandable. And no amount of begging, pleading, or berating will change that (although it might get you punched in the face). That pope Gregory XIII neglected to include a year 0 in his calendar doesn't have to condemn us to suffer the mental gymnastics in our daily live…

> 2020 is the beginning of a decade, because colloquially it's easier and understandable But 2020 is technically the start of a decade, not just informally.

That would imply that not all decades are 10 years long, sice there was no year 0.

Re: You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

#103
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> 2020 is the beginning of a decade, because colloquially it's easier and understandable But 2020 is technically the start of a decade, not just informally.

That would imply that not all decades are 10 years long, sice there was no year 0.

Either that or it means that the first nine years were not part of any decade.

Re: You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

#104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm a big proponent of continuous time zones, so that noon drifts ever so slightly as position changes. Seems like a no-brainer to me.

Definitely a no-brainer, I'd say.

Absolutely. No brain whatsoever.

Re: You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

#105
post #2

> your name for the thirteenth month is questionable In my plan for twelve 30-day months, I intended to call the leftover 5/6 days "Etcember", for et cetera. :P (This submission appears to be a riff on the classic "Programming Language Checklist": https://www.famicol.in/language_checklist.html )

This sounds like the French Revolutionary Calendar: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Republican_calendar

> ( ) they tried that in France once and it didn't take

Re: You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

#107
post #47

I advocate a solution similar to proposals floated years ago on alt.pave.the.earth on UseNet. 1. Disintegrate the moon, anyone who has ever advocated for lunar calendars, and anyone who fails to convincingly support this Plan(tm), converting their mass to energy that we can use for productive purposes such as orbital adjustments. 2. Adjust the rotational period of the earth to an aesthetically pleasing multiple of th…

> Adjust the axial tilt and orbital eccentricity of the earth to eliminate "seasons". So you’re the guy who wants to kill summer?

imagine if temperature was a function of geo-locale only.

Re: You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

#109

(2013) Previous discussion (the only substantial one at any rate): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11193152 The main problem with calendar reform as I see it is that network effects and lock-in mean that unless everyone changes at once it'll never stick. I've long felt that the optimal time for calendar reform was several decades ago -- with increasing computerisation the cost of switching has gone up over time,…

[deleted]

Re: You advocate a ________ approach to calendar reform (2013)

#110
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Time zones were a premature optimization. Now we all have GPS, so we can return to location based times.

Timezones were introduced as a generalization of country wide time references. And those were introduced because trains became so fast that calculating train tables with local time was very confusing. That issue wouldn’t be solved with GPS.

Of course it would! You know the location of each station and your watch would automatically adjust depending on your location as you travel (using GPS or whatever). People with mechanical wristwatches might find it tedious :-)
Post reply on HN