I know this font is about versatility, but when it comes to a coding font I have yet to find something that beats JetBrains Mono (and I've tried many coding fonts). https://www.jetbrains.com/lp/mono/
Have you tried Inconsolata? I like Jetbrains Mono a lot too, but somehow still stick to Inconsolata, even after trying so many others so many times.
Recursive, a free variable font for code and UI, now on Google Fonts
51–60 of 113 posts
Re: Recursive, a free variable font for code and UI, now on Google Fonts
#52Re: Recursive, a free variable font for code and UI, now on Google Fonts
#53The Google Fonts page doesn't really do justice to how dynamic this font is -- https://www.recursive.design/ has a live demo that shows more of the options, maybe the link should be changed to their demo. There are four dimensions and a few other flags that the font can be adjusted by in CSS: natural-width to fixed-width, Linear to "Casual", Font weight, Font slant, and cursive variants. By tweaking any of the variab…
The question is: do we need flexible fonts? Other than fine-tuning the monospace font to fit your exact preferences given the hours you spend coding, everything else seems to be a matter of just picking an appropriate type that fits your project
Take two was Adobe's Multiple Master extension to Type 1. Technically this is still used by Adobe Acrobat to handle fallbacks for missing fonts, but as an end-user technology it was a failure, largely because of difficulties in being able to use the interpolated fonts—few applications allowed direct selection of interpolated designs and users had to generate them in ATM instead.
So now we have the third attempt, with better application support, which has some hope of success. For text type users, the appeal is the ability to finally regain optical scaling for type designs. Traditionally, as a type design was created at a smaller size, it would become relatively darker with less contrast. Perhaps the most dramatic example of this in everyday use is to compare the spindly appearance of "fake" small caps with the more robust appearance of properly designed small caps. So this is one case where, yes, we really do want this ability.
Re: Recursive, a free variable font for code and UI, now on Google Fonts
#54The Google Fonts page doesn't really do justice to how dynamic this font is -- https://www.recursive.design/ has a live demo that shows more of the options, maybe the link should be changed to their demo. There are four dimensions and a few other flags that the font can be adjusted by in CSS: natural-width to fixed-width, Linear to "Casual", Font weight, Font slant, and cursive variants. By tweaking any of the variab…
It was a bit frustrating viewing this site on Firefox and not having any indication of why the settings weren't changing anything.
Of course, maybe that's because there hasn't been enough demand for it, and now that there is a font that's widely available which can use this, Firefox might finish enabling it (looks like there is a flag for it, but it's not enabled by default).
Re: Recursive, a free variable font for code and UI, now on Google Fonts
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
The question is: do we need flexible fonts? Other than fine-tuning the monospace font to fit your exact preferences given the hours you spend coding, everything else seems to be a matter of just picking an appropriate type that fits your project
As a coder, probably not. As a designer, absolutely. The exact weight of a font can make a ton of difference in a finished product, and it's frequent to be frustrated that the font isn't available in the weight that would look right for the needs -- you need something in between semibold and bold, or something in between regular and condensed, or something oblique but not that oblique. It's the difference between a d…
Re: Recursive, a free variable font for code and UI, now on Google Fonts
#56The Google Fonts page doesn't really do justice to how dynamic this font is -- https://www.recursive.design/ has a live demo that shows more of the options, maybe the link should be changed to their demo. There are four dimensions and a few other flags that the font can be adjusted by in CSS: natural-width to fixed-width, Linear to "Casual", Font weight, Font slant, and cursive variants. By tweaking any of the variab…
Unfortunately, font-variation-settings isn't supported by Firefox, Safari, IE, or older versions of Edge, so these settings only work for ~70% of users according to Can I Use. It was a bit frustrating viewing this site on Firefox and not having any indication of why the settings weren't changing anything. Of course, maybe that's because there hasn't been enough demand for it, and now that there is a font that's widel…
Re: Recursive, a free variable font for code and UI, now on Google Fonts
#57Re: Recursive, a free variable font for code and UI, now on Google Fonts
#58It’s very impressive that they have managed to duplex the styles across all four dimensions. This is very difficult to do across a wide range of weights while keeping the whole family cohesive.
Re: Recursive, a free variable font for code and UI, now on Google Fonts
#59The Google Fonts page doesn't really do justice to how dynamic this font is -- https://www.recursive.design/ has a live demo that shows more of the options, maybe the link should be changed to their demo. There are four dimensions and a few other flags that the font can be adjusted by in CSS: natural-width to fixed-width, Linear to "Casual", Font weight, Font slant, and cursive variants. By tweaking any of the variab…
Re: Recursive, a free variable font for code and UI, now on Google Fonts
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
The question is: do we need flexible fonts? Other than fine-tuning the monospace font to fit your exact preferences given the hours you spend coding, everything else seems to be a matter of just picking an appropriate type that fits your project
As a coder, probably not. As a designer, absolutely. The exact weight of a font can make a ton of difference in a finished product, and it's frequent to be frustrated that the font isn't available in the weight that would look right for the needs -- you need something in between semibold and bold, or something in between regular and condensed, or something oblique but not that oblique. It's the difference between a d…