A gem of a legal opinion spanking a lawyer for a frivolous copyright claim
1–10 of 22 posts
Re: A gem of a legal opinion spanking a lawyer for a frivolous copyright claim
#2This is for law buffs (30-page decision).
It concerns an attorney who had hired a forensic firm to support his litigation matter and who felt they had overbilled and/or churned the matter. He asked a one-sentence question on a listserv forum about whether anyone else had had a bad experience with the firm. One person forwarded the question to his spouse and the spouse forwarded it to the firm whose services were being questioned. The lawyer then went to the U.S. Copyright Office and, believe it or not, registered his one-sentence inquiry as a copyright and then sued the parties who had forwarded it for infringement!
For those interested (and I realize this is not a matter of general interest):
1. The case documents the absurd lengths to which some people, and especially a certain type of lawyer, will go to bully and intimidate through litigation.
2. The opinion itself is beautifully analyzed and written and contains a very informative discussion of what sort of short phrase is or is not copyrightable and of what the standards are for fair use (it is legal technical stuff but quite understandable).
3. The judge has some priceless jabs in the decision, e.g., footnote 7, where she considered the lawyer's point whether a one-sentence line from Shakespeare ("to be or not to be", from Hamlet) might have been copyrightable and retorted that the better inquiry here might have been about Much Ado About Nothing.
The patient will be well rewarded in reading through this one (you can skip or skim past parts that are not of general interest, e.g., the legal standard for summary judgment).
Bottom line: after 2 years of very expensive litigation, the offending lawyer is about to get socked with a massive attorney fee award that the judge already decided he will pay "for pursuing such folderol," leaving only the amount to be determined.
Re: A gem of a legal opinion spanking a lawyer for a frivolous copyright claim
#3This is for law buffs (30-page decision). It concerns an attorney who had hired a forensic firm to support his litigation matter and who felt they had overbilled and/or churned the matter. He asked a one-sentence question on a listserv forum about whether anyone else had had a bad experience with the firm. One person forwarded the question to his spouse and the spouse forwarded it to the firm whose services were bein…
The fool paid $750 to register (an invalid) copyright in a listserv one-liner! Amazing, even if you don't consider the hundreds of thousands of dollars expended on this lawsuit ($70,000 claimed by the defendants, and I assume he'd claim something similar in costs if he was entitled to them).
First time I've seen judgements with a heading that is subtitled - in chinese - with a Sun Tzu quotation! It's at p5, and says (according to the translating footnote): “He will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight.” Sun Tzu, The Art of War 32-33 (Lionel Giles trans., Ulysses Press 2007)
Even more wonderful is the complaint - from a lawyer! - that the alleged copyright infringement caused medical harm: "[i]n having to deal with the violation of my copyright, I have experienced aggravation of the then arthritis in my right hip, which resulted in excess pain in the hip and leg and a decrease in the range of motion in my leg and hip."
Re: A gem of a legal opinion spanking a lawyer for a frivolous copyright claim
#4Good stuff. Now if we could only get some similar opinions in Righthaven copyright troll cases, we'd be making some progress!
Re: A gem of a legal opinion spanking a lawyer for a frivolous copyright claim
#5I like the snide remarks from Public Citizen when they are pursuing CDA stuff. http://pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/2011/02/javelin-marketing-...
I love how he says in his letter "even assuming that your letter is sufficiently original to be copyrightable, and that you register the copyright, the posting of your letter will be fair use and hence not actionable"
Re: A gem of a legal opinion spanking a lawyer for a frivolous copyright claim
#6This is for law buffs (30-page decision). It concerns an attorney who had hired a forensic firm to support his litigation matter and who felt they had overbilled and/or churned the matter. He asked a one-sentence question on a listserv forum about whether anyone else had had a bad experience with the firm. One person forwarded the question to his spouse and the spouse forwarded it to the firm whose services were bein…
The patient are well rewarded indeed, with asides such as note 12: 12 “Plaintiff beliefs [sic], when [White Zuckerman’s employee] used the word slander,considering the context of the comment, she really meant liable [sic]. Confusing liable [sic] with slander is a mistake people commonly make.” (2nd Am. Compl. ถ 56.) Confusing “libel” with “liable” is also a commonly-made mistake.
Re: A gem of a legal opinion spanking a lawyer for a frivolous copyright claim
#7This is for law buffs (30-page decision). It concerns an attorney who had hired a forensic firm to support his litigation matter and who felt they had overbilled and/or churned the matter. He asked a one-sentence question on a listserv forum about whether anyone else had had a bad experience with the firm. One person forwarded the question to his spouse and the spouse forwarded it to the firm whose services were bein…
The patient are well rewarded indeed, with asides such as note 12: 12 “Plaintiff beliefs [sic], when [White Zuckerman’s employee] used the word slander,considering the context of the comment, she really meant liable [sic]. Confusing liable [sic] with slander is a mistake people commonly make.” (2nd Am. Compl. ถ 56.) Confusing “libel” with “liable” is also a commonly-made mistake.
And this about the Plaintiff trick of a copyright app for the 1-line email:
"As discussed above, Plaintiff is incorrect
about the validity of his copyright because his listserv post lacks originality.
Nonetheless, Plaintiff’s originality argument was not objectively unreasonable. The
problem with Plaintiff’s copyright claim lies in Defendants’ obvious fair-use defense. A
reasonable person, particularly one who happens to be an attorney, would not have
pursued such folderol. Plaintiff’s decision to proceed with this patently meritless cause
of action supports a fee award."
Re: A gem of a legal opinion spanking a lawyer for a frivolous copyright claim
#8This is for law buffs (30-page decision). It concerns an attorney who had hired a forensic firm to support his litigation matter and who felt they had overbilled and/or churned the matter. He asked a one-sentence question on a listserv forum about whether anyone else had had a bad experience with the firm. One person forwarded the question to his spouse and the spouse forwarded it to the firm whose services were bein…
The fool paid $750 to register (an invalid) copyright in a listserv one-liner! Amazing, even if you don't consider the hundreds of thousands of dollars expended on this lawsuit ($70,000 claimed by the defendants, and I assume he'd claim something similar in costs if he was entitled to them). First time I've seen judgements with a heading that is subtitled - in chinese - with a Sun Tzu quotation! It's at p5, and says…
To the medical claim, the judge retorts with the quote "...which really boils down to ‘hurt feelings’". Heh.
The Chinese quotation was startling. Having read the judgement, methinks I'm allowed to copy it.
Overall the entire opinion impresses me both with the comprehensive wit and precision applied to eviscerate the claim, and with the sobering observation that current judicial practice calls for a 30-page comprehensive opinion required to reach the conclusion when "you idiot, get out of my courtroom" should have been sufficient.
Re: A gem of a legal opinion spanking a lawyer for a frivolous copyright claim
#9This is for law buffs (30-page decision). It concerns an attorney who had hired a forensic firm to support his litigation matter and who felt they had overbilled and/or churned the matter. He asked a one-sentence question on a listserv forum about whether anyone else had had a bad experience with the firm. One person forwarded the question to his spouse and the spouse forwarded it to the firm whose services were bein…
[deleted]
Re: A gem of a legal opinion spanking a lawyer for a frivolous copyright claim
#10This is proof, if any was needed, that judges and the law is often quite reasonable.