Live data from Hacker News

Trump administration establishes $75M quantum computing centers

thehill.com

21–30 of 143 posts

Re: Trump administration establishes $75M quantum computing centers

#21

Why does the title have to be political ans not "The US gov..."? Sounds like there is an agenda

> "The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and the National Science Foundation (NSF) announced Tuesday the establishment of three quantum computing centers across the nation, involving an investment of $75 million."

It was a White House initiative, so the headline seems to be accurate.

Re: Trump administration establishes $75M quantum computing centers

#22
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree. It'd be concerning if they launched with some obscene $1 billion type financial tag with it. If or when it makes sense, they can always increase funding for these three centers and or to build additional centers. Which is exactly what I'd expect in the coming years.

I dunno. This seems worthy of a lot more funding than a dog walking app that raised $361 million https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/wag

That's a SoftBank valuation. Those were inflated.

Re: Trump administration establishes $75M quantum computing centers

#23

"Defund the computing centers" when?

The last time I checked, computing centers haven't been murdering people.

So check again. You can start by IBM back in the 40s ... and today have a look at NSA and CCP as well."

Would be a nice "research" actaully.

Re: Trump administration establishes $75M quantum computing centers

#25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>It's the sort of fundamental research which private industry tends to under-produce because it's hard for any given company to recoup the full value of the R&D, but the target area is something with potential downstream practical implications. Quantum computing ? I've seen just a few months ago some article about a single start-up raising >200M ?

There is a difference between doing fundamental research and bringing a product to market. We know enough about quantum computers to be able to build some of them in limited ways which are commercially useful in very specific domains, so then companies can get investment to do that. But we still don't really understand all of the fundamentals, and it's always hard to raise investment for fundamental research. Suppose…

> We know enough about quantum computers to be able to build some of them in limited ways which are commercially useful in very specific domains

In which way are quantum computers commercially useful?

Re: Trump administration establishes $75M quantum computing centers

#26
post #9

This initiative is launched quicker than I expected, considering the pressure on federal budget due to the pandemic. It's part of National Quantum Initiative Act, signed into law in December, 2018. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/6227

$75M is rounding error compared to anything being discussed in the vicinity of the pandemic; I wouldn't really expect it to enter into the conversation.

Re: Trump administration establishes $75M quantum computing centers

#27

Why does the title have to be political ans not "The US gov..."? Sounds like there is an agenda

If the administration deserves the blame when it does something bad, it deserves the credit when it does something good.

"does" is doing a lot of work there.

Re: Trump administration establishes $75M quantum computing centers

#29

Why does the title have to be political ans not "The US gov..."? Sounds like there is an agenda

The Hill is focused primarily on Washington politics so 75% of the stories are about the Administration/House/Senate/Supreme Court/Agency putting out a press release or taking some procedural step.

Re: Trump administration establishes $75M quantum computing centers

#30

Why does the title have to be political ans not "The US gov..."? Sounds like there is an agenda

Turn on any NPR News broadcast over at least the past two decades and the first story will invariably start "The ______ administration…", regardless of who's in office.
Post reply on HN