Live data from Hacker News

RED Epic camera - six times the resolution of HD video

khalednoorblog.com

51–53 of 53 posts

Re: RED Epic camera - six times the resolution of HD video

#51
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which means it's not even remotely comparable for professional work. Keep in mind that it's not just the amount, but the type of compression that's decisive. Spatial codecs (also known as intraframe schemes) deal with each frame independently. That is to say, they don't apply calculations across a set of frames, even when much of the information is repeated. Temporal codecs (also known as interframe, of which H.264 i…

I have seen some 5D stuff that was pretty good and House used one for an episode. I think the Epic is going to be a big hit (size, 5K raw) and I expect the same of Scarlet.

House is engineered for television, not big screen projection. And it has no time of money for serious effects. Also, it's mostly shot in situations with very controlled lighting. Add all that up and it means there's a lot that they can get away with. It's great that they did. But that was very recently, and again, the original question was 'why didn't this happen a decade ago?'.

Re: RED Epic camera - six times the resolution of HD video

#52
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Minor nitpick: "2K" is actually very close to 1080p: 2048x1080 vs 1920x1080.

You've misunderstood what '2k' means - it refers to the y axis, not the x. Both aspect ratios you cite are effectively 1k. Also, regarding Avatar - see the comment above about what it takes to compensate for lower resolution sources. There is absolutely no comparison between what Jim Cameron can do with 1080p + a quarter billion dollars, and what the average Sundance aspirant is trying to pull off for less than a mil…

I've always seen "2K" or "4K" or "nK" used to refer to the X axis. My sources:

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Image_resolut...

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Digital_cinem...

Re: RED Epic camera - six times the resolution of HD video

#53
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You've misunderstood what '2k' means - it refers to the y axis, not the x. Both aspect ratios you cite are effectively 1k. Also, regarding Avatar - see the comment above about what it takes to compensate for lower resolution sources. There is absolutely no comparison between what Jim Cameron can do with 1080p + a quarter billion dollars, and what the average Sundance aspirant is trying to pull off for less than a mil…

I've always seen "2K" or "4K" or "nK" used to refer to the X axis. My sources: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Image_resolut... https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Digital_cinem...

I stand corrected. And thanks for the links.
Post reply on HN