101–110 of 159 posts
First Person I saw on the 71 bus? Second Person I saw on the 74 bus? Third Person I saw on the 75 bus?
When I saw those lines spelled out like that, I read them as above. Just kinda made sense. Looking at the rest.
(M*D MK*\#R-*-STA-K*AR\) (ACSM)
oTFR*\*Pt*S\WPBS\RCBB*S\*PRS\I*C
PRS\*MRS\OPR\HLDWLD*CS\(TXFLFTCXL*C*\)
AL-pRPPITXLYPPIY*CB\M\KS\i*CdS\PRS\
WLDRCBR*S\*ToS*\*TXS\-CrSL\-CITRS\WLD*CB\
ALWlP*CB\TSM\LrS\RLS\VRGLS*\AS*WLD*CB\
(*OPFS\*LR\*CB\)*T\GDDM*S\*CUR\RcBR*\
(T\W\ TFR*\ *CbrTS\ *CB\ I*G)-
(FIRS\ PRS\ O*D\ 71 *CB\)-
(CD*S\ PRS\ O*S\ 74 *CB\)-
(PRTS\ PRS\ O*\R D\ 75 *CB\)
(TF*GCMSOL\MRD\LUS\TOT\WLD*wLD*CB\)
(194WLD'S*CB\)(TRFXC)
ALP*T\GLS\-S\ \RT\
YLS\ MTS\-CTS\-WS\-FRTS\
P*RTRS\O*DRS\WLD*CB\
*WLDXLRCMSP*\DVLDSTSM\XL
DULMT6TU*S\*CB\XC
(mU*SARST\* MU *ARS\)
KLS\-LRST\-TRS\-MKS\*-MRS\
(SA\6*S\S\MRC\)
*M*RCBRS*\PT\2pT\WSRCBK*s\
86MLS\74SPRKS\29K\*O*OL\17SRTRS\
356L\CLGs\ou*UTRf*KRS\PS\SHL\
651MTCS\HTLS\*CUTCTRS*MR\
{99.84.52} U*\P25\*CRS\AOKTS\*SKS\*rS\
*SR\O*S\PVTS\WLD*CB\(JXORL)
**MS\*RS\I*R*TR*TRL\RCBR*S\*TSRCRs*\
LSP*S\*GSPS\MKS\RBS\*C\AVXLR
HMCR\*MR\*CB\ 1/2MU*DDLS\
D-W-MIYMPL XDRXIf you replace the "N"s with and asterisk and "E"s with a slash you get something that looks like this: (M*D MK*\#R-*-STA-K*AR\) (ACSM) oTFR*\*Pt*S\WPBS\RCBB*S\*PRS\I*C PRS\*MRS\OPR\HLDWLD*CS\(TXFLFTCXL*C*\) AL-pRPPITXLYPPIY*CB\M\KS\i*CdS\PRS\ WLDRCBR*S\*ToS*\*TXS\-CrSL\-CITRS\WLD*CB\ ALWlP*CB\TSM\LrS\RLS\VRGLS*\AS*WLD*CB\ (*OPFS\*LR\*CB\)*T\GDDM*S\*CUR\RcBR*\ (T\W\ TFR*\ *CbrTS\ *CB\ I*G)- (FIRS\ PRS\ O*D\ 71 *CB\)-…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Why do half of people claim to be above average? Because of illusory superiority. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_superiority )
That would be why more than half of people claim this. I should have said "Why could half of people claim to be above the median ." Oh dear. I think I might be below average.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Excellent. I personally love this sort of thing, though I'm rarely successful. I was typing out the letters as I saw them, and I noticed that I interpreted many of your "S" as the number 5, but after looking at the way he wrote "S", it appears relatively consistent throughout the text. So letter groupings became interesting: SE - 66 matches RSE - 18 matches In the first document TFNRE appears twice. Here's my interpr…
(MnD MKNE#R-N-STA-KNARE) (ACSM) oTFRNENPtNSEWPBSERCBBNSENPRSEINC PRSENMRSEOPREHLDWLDNCSE(TXFLFTCXLNC*E) AL-pRPPITXLYPPIYNCBEMEKSEinCdSEPRSE WLDRCBRNSEnToSNEnTXSE-CrSLE-CITRSEWLDNCBE ALWlPNCBETSMELrSERLSEVRGLSNEASNWLDNCBE (NOPFSENLRENCBE)NTEGDDMNSENCURERcBRne (TEWE TFRNE NCbrTSE NCBE InG)- (FIRSE PRSE ONDE 71 NCBE)- (CDnSE PRSE ONSE 74 NCBE)- (PRTSE PRSE ONER DE 75 NCBE) (TFNGCMSOLEMRDELUSETOTEWLDnwLDnCBE) (194WLD'SNC…
>One has to wonder though, if the FBI can't figure this out, who can? This is frustrating. Why would we assume the best people possible all work for the FBI? Is there nothing else the best people could be doing? We already know that everyone isn't hiring the top 1%
We know that he's had this "language" since he was a child so I'm going to go out on a limb here (and introduce no small measure of my own bias) and guess its not a cerebral cipher that will easily be unraveled by simple frequency of note correlation. I've likely got a touch of Asperger's myself and I know I have a bigger touch of synesthesia. I remember vividly during my childhood certain words being an explosion of…
> Is there a way to just output the letters as a stream of phonyms? After noticing the frequency of NCBE, I focused on these three lines from the first document: (FLRSE PRSE ONDE 71 NCBE) (CDNSE PRSE ONS*E 74 NCBE) (PR+SE PRSE ONREDE 75 NCBE) They seem pronounceable in a sort of pig-latin style - "Flur-say pur-say ohn-day 71 nick-bay" > although its tough to say "oranger than orange with a texture like crumpled sandp…
I think in any case this points to it being directions of some sort. PRSE is probably a verb of some sort if those are infact directions.
We know that he's had this "language" since he was a child so I'm going to go out on a limb here (and introduce no small measure of my own bias) and guess its not a cerebral cipher that will easily be unraveled by simple frequency of note correlation. I've likely got a touch of Asperger's myself and I know I have a bigger touch of synesthesia. I remember vividly during my childhood certain words being an explosion of…
We know that he's had this "language" since he was a child so I'm going to go out on a limb here (and introduce no small measure of my own bias) and guess its not a cerebral cipher that will easily be unraveled by simple frequency of note correlation. I've likely got a touch of Asperger's myself and I know I have a bigger touch of synesthesia. I remember vividly during my childhood certain words being an explosion of…
> Is there a way to just output the letters as a stream of phonyms? After noticing the frequency of NCBE, I focused on these three lines from the first document: (FLRSE PRSE ONDE 71 NCBE) (CDNSE PRSE ONS*E 74 NCBE) (PR+SE PRSE ONREDE 75 NCBE) They seem pronounceable in a sort of pig-latin style - "Flur-say pur-say ohn-day 71 nick-bay" > although its tough to say "oranger than orange with a texture like crumpled sandp…
We know that he's had this "language" since he was a child so I'm going to go out on a limb here (and introduce no small measure of my own bias) and guess its not a cerebral cipher that will easily be unraveled by simple frequency of note correlation. I've likely got a touch of Asperger's myself and I know I have a bigger touch of synesthesia. I remember vividly during my childhood certain words being an explosion of…
> Is there a way to just output the letters as a stream of phonyms? After noticing the frequency of NCBE, I focused on these three lines from the first document: (FLRSE PRSE ONDE 71 NCBE) (CDNSE PRSE ONS*E 74 NCBE) (PR+SE PRSE ONREDE 75 NCBE) They seem pronounceable in a sort of pig-latin style - "Flur-say pur-say ohn-day 71 nick-bay" > although its tough to say "oranger than orange with a texture like crumpled sandp…