Cloudflare: Is anyone else seeing DNS outages?
31–40 of 55 posts
Re: Cloudflare: Is anyone else seeing DNS outages?
#32Well I just rebooted my modem, but modem + router checked out (I know the IPs). Rebooted the Pi-Hole, seems to be back up now. Cloudflare is the only DNS my Pi-Hole forwards to. I think I will add another, now..
Which ones are you going to add? Just curious. :)
Re: Cloudflare: Is anyone else seeing DNS outages?
#33Yep, github actions failing because of this too.
Re: Cloudflare: Is anyone else seeing DNS outages?
#34Re: Cloudflare: Is anyone else seeing DNS outages?
#35I can't get to chess.com.
Re: Cloudflare: Is anyone else seeing DNS outages?
#36Re: Cloudflare: Is anyone else seeing DNS outages?
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which ones are you going to add? Just curious. :)
I've used 4.2.2.1 extensively in the past, and never had any issues. 4.2.2.1 through 4.2.2.6 are run by Level 3
Re: Cloudflare: Is anyone else seeing DNS outages?
#38I wish my computer was smart enough to "healthcheck" the primary and secondary, and fallback to using the secondary as the primary until it becomes healthy again.
Re: Cloudflare: Is anyone else seeing DNS outages?
#39$ dig @1.1.1.1 google.com ; > DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u1-Raspbian > @1.1.1.1 google.com ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached $ dig @1.0.0.1 google.com ; > DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u1-Raspbian > @1.0.0.1 google.com ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
; > DiG 9.11.20-RedHat-9.11.20-1.fc32 > @1.1.1.1 google.com ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;google.com. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION: google.com. 249 IN A 216.58.206.174
;; Query time: 9 msec ;; SERVER: 1.1.1.1#53(1.1.1.1) ;; WHEN: Sat Jul 18 00:38:35 +03 2020 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 65
Re: Cloudflare: Is anyone else seeing DNS outages?
#40$ dig @1.1.1.1 google.com ; > DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u1-Raspbian > @1.1.1.1 google.com ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached $ dig @1.0.0.1 google.com ; > DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u1-Raspbian > @1.0.0.1 google.com ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
Even when the secondary works the performance is pretty miserable. Adds about a 1s latency to each DNS resolution while it wait's for the primary to fail.