Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some of the negatives: 1)Phishing, if your private keys and password are compromised your money is gone. 2)Regulations, although governments would find it difficult, if not impossible, to regulate BitCoin. They can regulate the exchange of BitCoin into everyday fiat currencies. We seen this with the likes of e-gold when exchangers were cracked down on due to the ease of laundering money in the system. 3)Value, if peo…
If you leave your wallet on the beach your cash is gone or someone could pickpocket you. Egold was located on a central server that was liable to confiscation. You can buy alpaca socks with bitcoin. You can do money laundering ,cp and drugs with US dollars.
E-gold's centralised system was not what I was debating. It was the exchange of e-gold to fiat currencies.
Alpaca socks I will assume are created by the person who actual sells them. Dealing with other suppliers who won't accept BitCoin was the obstacle I was detailing.
I don't debate that you can launder money in USD but it is easier in this system. There's no paper trail, well there's no identity linked to wallets.