Anyone have links to more of these images? Also, if you search for the source for one of the images (mentioned in the article), you can find this tweet: https://twitter.com/UnderTheBreach/status/128349929454113177... which says the recent hacks were done through that tool.
I'm starting to think web facing site admin is a bad idea. Assuming that's what this is, I don't know. But I'm surprised it's still a thing.
Twitter internal panel linked to account hijackings
41–50 of 477 posts
Re: Twitter internal panel linked to account hijackings
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
The next time we swing the other way: "Maybe government should embrace popular communication media instead of spending billions on custom IT infrastructure to post a message on a custom page that everyone screenshots and copies to their timeline anyway." (Also if they don't create an "official account", someone else will do it for them)
> (Also if they don't create an "official account", someone else will do it for them) What do you mean? How would anyone not affiliated with a given government agency convince human verifiers at Twitter that they're official?
If you don't snatch up your (organization's) name first, someone will surely do so for you.
(Honestly not trying to incite anything by using him as an example; I just hardly use Twitter and he was the first to come to mind.)
Re: Twitter internal panel linked to account hijackings
#43“Trends Blacklist” & “Search Blacklist” are interesting buttons. Manipulation much ?
If the screenshot is real, I'm pretty sure that Scott Adams (the cartoonist) has that Search Blacklist button applied to him. I recently tried to search for users with his name, and he wouldn't appear at all (while unverified names with 0 followers would show up). Had to go through DuckDuckGo to find his handle.
This leak seems to be legit.
Re: Twitter internal panel linked to account hijackings
#44“Trends Blacklist” & “Search Blacklist” are interesting buttons. Manipulation much ?
Re: Twitter internal panel linked to account hijackings
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm starting to think web facing site admin is a bad idea. Assuming that's what this is, I don't know. But I'm surprised it's still a thing.
Is there a better solution? How do you airgap administration of a web facing service?
Re: Twitter internal panel linked to account hijackings
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably not: https://shadowban.eu/scottadamssays
You're right, thanks for the link. I was surprised because I searched for users with the name "Scott Adams" and it was promoting users with 0 followers and not showing his verified account at all. This was through Tweetbot iOS.
Re: Twitter internal panel linked to account hijackings
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm starting to think web facing site admin is a bad idea. Assuming that's what this is, I don't know. But I'm surprised it's still a thing.
Is there a better solution? How do you airgap administration of a web facing service?
Re: Twitter internal panel linked to account hijackings
#48> Hawley said "please reach out immediately to the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and take any necessary measures to secure the site before this breach expands It's kind of bizarre when you have the highest levels of government doing their critical communication on a free social media service to the point where they are critically dependent on it, then begging for support when things go…
Re: Twitter internal panel linked to account hijackings
#49According to some images, Twitter low level employees can see email address of all accounts (and I guess phone numbers). I know some celebrities have their real email address and phone numbers on those accounts. Isn't that something bad?
Re: Twitter internal panel linked to account hijackings
#50https://twitter.com/TwitterSupport/status/128359184496275046...