Nobody wanted to hear about security.
Hack of 251 Law Enforcement Websites Exposes Personal Data of 700k Cops
21–30 of 84 posts
Re: Hack of 251 Law Enforcement Websites Exposes Personal Data of 700k Cops
#22Re: Hack of 251 Law Enforcement Websites Exposes Personal Data of 700k Cops
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Including address and phone number? Doesn't that also enable public workers to be target of harassment?
Could this be a problem? Yes, naturally. But the good of preventing government corruption outweighs the bad in this case. There are existing laws against harassment that provide recourse.
Re: Hack of 251 Law Enforcement Websites Exposes Personal Data of 700k Cops
#24Re: Hack of 251 Law Enforcement Websites Exposes Personal Data of 700k Cops
#25This isn't right. Group behavior should not affect individuals in this way.
Police officers aren't being judged or punished for the color of their skin, creed, religion, or sexuality but their choices. I find it hard to stomach the idea that people shouldn't be judged for the organizations they choose to represent.
Re: Hack of 251 Law Enforcement Websites Exposes Personal Data of 700k Cops
#26I didn't realize Twitter and Reddit were suppressing discussion of the blueLeaks data. It's an interesting position to take. If you can discussion of all leaked data dumps do you draw the line when it is about state actors? Can you discuss Equifax hack, that is about personal information as well, but was done by state actors?
Wikileaks actually redacted a lot of (personal) data to protect people (tho some people like to claim again and again they did not). BlueLeaks, it appears, does not, and contains home addresses and other personal information of cops. Create transparency, investigate and show police misconduct? Great! Put cops and their families at risk? Nope!
Re: Hack of 251 Law Enforcement Websites Exposes Personal Data of 700k Cops
#27I have a philosophical problem with leaking people's personal information but I admit that I'm curious. I want to see what's in this data.
Re: Hack of 251 Law Enforcement Websites Exposes Personal Data of 700k Cops
#28If you are getting paid by tax dollars then your personal data is a matter of public record. It is vital for prevention of corruption for the public to know where the tax dollars actually go.
Including address and phone number? Doesn't that also enable public workers to be target of harassment?
Real Name -> Phone number is nearly public information, being easily looked up in commercial surveillance databases. I've gotten phone calls from businesses on a associated numbers that I don't even consider mine due to this.
Framing a list of public servants as "doxing" is just a thinly-veiled power play to prevent accountability over the rest of the contents.
Re: Hack of 251 Law Enforcement Websites Exposes Personal Data of 700k Cops
#29Does it seem a little disjointed between the article's content (exposing overuse and misuse of Fusion centers via a hack) and the headline/inline focus of "700,000 Law Enforcement Officers Exposed"? Almost like they were allowed to run the article but editor didn't like the angle or something.
Re: Hack of 251 Law Enforcement Websites Exposes Personal Data of 700k Cops
#30>For example, the Northern California Regional Intelligence Center has 29,114 accounts, and each one includes a full name; rank; police department or agency; email address; home address, ... So that means that anyone with access to the system can get the home addresses of all their co-workers that also have accounts on the system? Why would all this personal information be associated with an account of this type? Thi…