Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's of note because it's uncommon.
A 2.4m condo in Manhattan is hardly uncommon.
Co-founder of Gokada found decapitated, dismembered inside New York condo
21–30 of 405 posts
Re: Co-founder of Gokada found decapitated, dismembered inside New York condo
#22The focus on the cost of the victim’s dwelling is so weird. I hope when they find my body they don’t waste half the article projecting local housing policy onto me, as if it were my fault.
Re: Co-founder of Gokada found decapitated, dismembered inside New York condo
#23Re: Co-founder of Gokada found decapitated, dismembered inside New York condo
#24The focus on the cost of the victim’s dwelling is so weird. I hope when they find my body they don’t waste half the article projecting local housing policy onto me, as if it were my fault.
It's of note because it's uncommon.
Edit: The article keeps changing, it originally said 200 W Houston, now it says both 200 East Houston and 365 E. Houston.
Edit #2: In a standing proof that local journalism isn't worth the cost of the paper it would take to print it out and wipe your ass with it, the actual location, judging from the video that accompanies the article is 265 E. Houston.
Re: Co-founder of Gokada found decapitated, dismembered inside New York condo
#25So police don't even know the cause of death, or anything else, but they do know they have video of the "killer"? I wish I were clairvoyant like this, but otherwise, may I never come under investigation from those people.
Re: Co-founder of Gokada found decapitated, dismembered inside New York condo
#26Re: Co-founder of Gokada found decapitated, dismembered inside New York condo
#27How horrible. Why would someone do this? I'd never heard of Gokada, it looks like such a cool thing for a developing country. I wonder what the motivation was. It doesn't seem like a market where there'd be the political pressure to assassinate someone. Maybe if there was someone trying to rethink the way pharmaceuticals or something, I could understand a CEO getting chopped into pieces by some shadowy figure, but ri…
He was facing an Uber-like regulatory situation in Lagos where his startup was facing a ban. If this was related to his startup (and not some other personal dealing) then a clear motive would be for a legacy carrier being disrupted to want end his startup...
Your comment made me realize I was making an assumption that it was related to his business. I guess I just figure for someone to be trying to make progress in a place where progress is sorely needed, that its unlikely for them to have relationships or dealings that would warrant such heavy-handed consequences.
If it was political, I wonder who benefits the most from this. Surely there will be scrutiny now, if there's more case details than are reported. I hope they don't get away with this. This will scare off entrepreneurs, maybe that's exactly what the killer wants. Maybe they want to discourage not only Gokada, but any company or product that might disrupt status quo.
Who knows. This is nasty stuff.
Re: Co-founder of Gokada found decapitated, dismembered inside New York condo
#28The focus on the cost of the victim’s dwelling is so weird. I hope when they find my body they don’t waste half the article projecting local housing policy onto me, as if it were my fault.
I think that directly participating in a system that prices people out of homes by purchasing a multi-million dollar unnecssarily luxurious home is absolutely blame-worthy.
Re: Co-founder of Gokada found decapitated, dismembered inside New York condo
#29The focus on the cost of the victim’s dwelling is so weird. I hope when they find my body they don’t waste half the article projecting local housing policy onto me, as if it were my fault.
I don't see anything at all about housing policy in the article. EDIT: It appears the link has been changed from (IIRC) a Chicago Tribune article to a New York Times article. My comment is about the original article.
Re: Co-founder of Gokada found decapitated, dismembered inside New York condo
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see anything at all about housing policy in the article. EDIT: It appears the link has been changed from (IIRC) a Chicago Tribune article to a New York Times article. My comment is about the original article.
"Luxury Condo" is right there in the headline.