Live data from Hacker News

Passbolt: Self hostable, open source, password manager for teams

passbolt.com

81–90 of 101 posts

Re: Passbolt: Self hostable, open source, password manager for teams

#82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I did a pretty thorough review of PassBolt a couple of years back when I was trying really hard to get a company to adopt it and give up their "we store our all of our passwords on a spreadsheet" approach. I don't have my notes any more, but off the top of my head, the big points in favor were: - Self-hostable. The tech guy in charge just resolutely would not use any hosted service, period. In his evaluation, trustin…

> - Built with PHP. Same guy was uncomfortable with Python, Node, and all that, and insisted that he be able to maintain and troubleshoot the codebase himself if necessary, so it had to be PHP. Now that's an interesting perspective, I don't think I've heard anyone consider PHP to be more secure than Python before.

People either love Python or hate it.

Re: Passbolt: Self hostable, open source, password manager for teams

#83
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I don't think I've heard anyone consider PHP to be more secure than Python before If you heard anyone discuss language X being more secure than language Y, then I'm sorry - but that person has no clue what they're talking about. PHP is as secure or insecure as Pythong / Ruby / Go / . Hammer depends on the one holding the hammer.

Of course; the best comparison you can make in security here is the amount of raw memory access. People condemn languages for two security reasons: the average level of competence in products usually written in a language, and the amount of footguns a language provides. PHP is very easy to learn, which is why a lot (really, a _lot_) of open source software is of very questionable quality. For many, it's the first pro…

>problematic history

You say it as if it didn't happen to Python and Go. Also experienced programmers are luxury.

Re: Passbolt: Self hostable, open source, password manager for teams

#84
post #38
post #33

You just need git, ssh and pass ( https://www.passwordstore.org/ ), see https://fr.jeffprod.com/blog/2019/gerez-vos-mots-de-passe-av... (french)

Or https://github.com/gopasspw/gopass if you want something passwordstore compatible but with additional team features.

I would probably use gopass if it would not enforce the usage of Git.

Re: Passbolt: Self hostable, open source, password manager for teams

#86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Of course; the best comparison you can make in security here is the amount of raw memory access. People condemn languages for two security reasons: the average level of competence in products usually written in a language, and the amount of footguns a language provides. PHP is very easy to learn, which is why a lot (really, a _lot_) of open source software is of very questionable quality. For many, it's the first pro…

>problematic history You say it as if it didn't happen to Python and Go. Also experienced programmers are luxury.

Every language has its troubled history, but PHP is especially famous for security vulnerabilities by either beginners or intuitive API design.

It might have something to do with the fact that PHP is still taught in a lot of web dev classes (though NodeJS has taken its crown) and that Go is relatively unknown for beginning programmers. Python generally just runs on your own machine because it's not as optimized for being a web language like PHP has been.

Re: Passbolt: Self hostable, open source, password manager for teams

#87

Pros - free open source - group management can be delegated - works fine with mac, linux & windows browsers - maintenance free self hosted on k8s for 2 years - lack of mobile apps has not been issue - UX is ok, no complaints - requires little end-user support Cons - only password field is encrypted - no warning that Notes are not encrypted - promises ‘Secure files & notes (Coming soon)’ for more than year - password…

Just to clarify, I was never a developer of Passbolt. I think they based their repository off of CakePHP (which I do maintain) and inherited all the commit history that way.

Thank for the clarification. Sorry for the misunderstanding this caused.

Re: Passbolt: Self hostable, open source, password manager for teams

#88
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just to clarify, I was never a developer of Passbolt. I think they based their repository off of CakePHP (which I do maintain) and inherited all the commit history that way.

Yes the repository was forked from CakePHP v2, before the framework was moved as a composer dependency, so v2 contributors are shown as Passbolt contributors.

Here's some extra context.

https://imgur.com/mzdeA65

The last contribution was over 4 years ago (first contribution was 12 years ago), which would be the remnants of the fork.

Re: Passbolt: Self hostable, open source, password manager for teams

#89

Pros - free open source - group management can be delegated - works fine with mac, linux & windows browsers - maintenance free self hosted on k8s for 2 years - lack of mobile apps has not been issue - UX is ok, no complaints - requires little end-user support Cons - only password field is encrypted - no warning that Notes are not encrypted - promises ‘Secure files & notes (Coming soon)’ for more than year - password…

Does sentry have password management options now?

Pros of Sentry (imho)

  - free open source
  - teams management can be delegated
  - works fine with mac, linux & windows browsers
  - maintenance free self hosted on k8s for 2 years
  - lack of mobile apps has not been issue
  - UX is ok, no complaints
  - requires little end-user support
This is the same list as the Pros for passbolt. And both ’just work’ without much maintenance or support, running self hosted on k8s for free.

Re: Passbolt: Self hostable, open source, password manager for teams

#90
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Likewise, and I'm loving Bitwarden so far! Although I'm using the dockerized rust API (1) for self-hosting it, and so far it's been working great for months! I am keeping a close eye on the container, and backing up the data hourly to ensure I don't need to worry about loosing anything. (1): https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs

I was evaluating Bitwarden years ago (before bitwarden_rs), but was thrown off by the lack of support for 2FA tokens without a subscription. Does selfhosting with bitwarden_rs solve this ? or do i still need a subscription for storing 2FA tokens along with passwords ? I have absolutely no problem paying once per major version for software, open source or not, but i refuse to pay any subscription. At least when buying…

Yes bitwarden_rs supports 2FA, including U2F keys. I setup my own instance in a Docker container on my Synology. I only have access to it while I am at home (or VPNed in) as I'm not willing to punch a hole in my firewall for external access.
Post reply on HN