Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why couldn't spammers just: s/(\w+)@(\w+)\.(fastmail\.fm)/\2@\3/g ...or equivalent?
In that instance you can. What is also nice though is if you have a custom domain, you can set the custom domain to do the same thing AND have an alias. So for me, I have a few emails in my custom domain: {firstname}@example.com market@example.com (there's others, but it's not relavent to this discussion). market@example.com just goes straight to spam, as I don't use that email for anything. foo@market.example.com is…
Microsoft adding support for custom '+' email addresses in Office 365
111–120 of 129 posts
Re: Microsoft adding support for custom '+' email addresses in Office 365
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
Periods are ignored in gmail and anything after a + is also ignored, so all of these will go to the same mailbox: johndoe@gmail.com john.doe@gmail.com j.o.h.n.d.o.e@gmail.com johndoe+spam@gmail.com john....doe+spam@gmail.com but johndoe.spam@gmail.com wouldn't go to the same mailbox.
john...doe@gmail.com doesn’t seem to work though. I don’t think Gmail takes multiple dots.
But sure, you could have `(my name is)john."..".doe+spam(...)@gmail.com` if you wanted to. Syntactically valid! The parenthesised bits would be stripped out before sending, and I have no idea whether Gmail would be willing to accept the quoted dots bit.
Re: Microsoft adding support for custom '+' email addresses in Office 365
#113Finally. This has only been allowed since RFC 822 (1982). Is there any reason why Microsoft did not support this from the beginning (of Exchange)?
> The local-part of an addr-spec in a mailbox specification (i.e., the host's name for the mailbox) is understood to be whatever the receiving mail protocol server allows. For example, some systems do not understand mailbox references of the form "P. D. Q. Bach", but others do.
Re: Microsoft adding support for custom '+' email addresses in Office 365
#114FastMail had some of the cleverest ideas for plus addressing. username+tag@fastmail.fm could be given away as tag@username.fastmail.fm
I used this for a few sites, but then stopped as I realized this would be a pain to change if I ever wanted to change to a different email provider. Wish every provider would support this as I’m sure spammers have caught on to the plus addressing scheme.
You can use a shared domain:`hackernews@snorremd.kopi.cloud` Or, after setting up an MX and a TXT DNS record, you can use your own domain: `hackernews@mail.snorremd.com`.
You can change the "real address" of any "forwarder" (`snorremd.kopi.cloud`/`mail.snorremd.com`) to relay to any address you want, whenever you want.
You can block individual addresses like `hackernews@mail.snorremd.com` with two clicks starting from your mail client.
You can also configure individual addresses to redirect to RSS so you can read newsletters or other "chatty" services as part of your normal browsing habits.
Re: Microsoft adding support for custom '+' email addresses in Office 365
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've long held the thought of having a mailbox that receives [everything]@[domain], except certain blacklisted addresses. As certain addresses get spam and/or I lose interest in the business I gave the address to, I add them to the blacklist. So far, I'm using AWS SES, which seems to be focused on the sending of marketing emails, and are not fussed on receiving, but includes rudimentary blacklisting. So far, it's zer…
How is it set up with SES? AFAIK they don't provide a POP/IMAP interface.
Then I have a script that uses the AWS CLI to move all the mail from the bucket to a local dovecot server.
The whole thing is really hacky/experimental at the moment, and I haven't given out any addresses, so all that I receive is spam. But the spam I do receive is very little and quickly adds to the blocked recipients list.
Sending using SES uses the built-in SMTP server functionality at AWS and has very generous limits for one who is not marketing.
Re: Microsoft adding support for custom '+' email addresses in Office 365
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
How is it set up with SES? AFAIK they don't provide a POP/IMAP interface.
I presume the parent means Amazon work mail which AFAIR uses SES to send. Last time I evaluated email services, they didn’t handle catch-all which made that a non-starter for us.
Re: Microsoft adding support for custom '+' email addresses in Office 365
#117FastMail had some of the cleverest ideas for plus addressing. username+tag@fastmail.fm could be given away as tag@username.fastmail.fm
I wrote that! I'm glad you like it. :) It's been nearly 20 years since I added that feature. I assumed at the time everyone would do it when they saw how handy it is. For some reason that didn't happen...
Re: Microsoft adding support for custom '+' email addresses in Office 365
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why do you use shopname@? Once you know the pattern everyone can guess it.
Not OP, but I'm guessing because it's easier to remember than completely random email address (password manager might solve this?) and more unique than using the same email everywhere.
Re: Microsoft adding support for custom '+' email addresses in Office 365
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
I use shopname@firstname.lastname.email, with my own lastname.email domain. Fastmail makes configuring your dns records for this super simple. It's always fun interacting with customer service reps when they for example confirm my email address... "errrrrr yeah so we email you at ourname@...?"
Wow I have the exact same setup – it works perfectly! I assume you also, like me, have a backup domain like lastname-email.com for all the broken email validators out there?
I use this one for two or three vital services, like banking and receiving government messages.
Meaning i have some backup should i forget to renew the .email domain...
Re: Microsoft adding support for custom '+' email addresses in Office 365
#120FastMail had some of the cleverest ideas for plus addressing. username+tag@fastmail.fm could be given away as tag@username.fastmail.fm
It's a little longer to read over the phone, but I've never had trouble with it. And I've been able to tell a couple of companies that their email databases had been hacked or stolen.
Disclaimer: just a satisfied customer.