Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your comment sound better if you where not implying I did not read the article (because I did multiple times). "It doesn't make sense to compare the qualities of This War of Mine, educational or otherwise, to those of Math Blaster. The fact that it's on a "reading list" should be the first clue. It really is a pretty interesting decision." Is much better. People take away different things from articles all the time.
How many times you had to read the article to understand it?
Obviously going to ignore the rather aggressive undertone. I clearly missed something in the article so I reread it. There is nothing wrong with that.
My comment was in reference to the guidelines, which clearly state
> Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that."