Live data from Hacker News

Recommended Flaw: 31% of Digg Homepage submitted by 10 Users

popfail.com

11–20 of 28 posts

Re: Recommended Flaw: 31% of Digg Homepage submitted by 10 Users

#11
post #10
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hey Paul, I speak to JD all the time (he wrote the article) and we've been looking at these numbers again every couple of hours for the last couple days, and the 31% that he wrote about (it hovers around the 30% mark) is fairly consistent when looking at the last 500 frontpaged stories. One thing he didn't write about was that at the time if you expanded it out to top 28 users, that number was around 51% of Digg's fr…

It doesn't seem strange to me. The top submitters aren't dictating the stories. They're just submitting them first. And it doesn't seem at all unlikely that a few dedicated users could be the first to find a large fraction of the stories that ultimately became popular.

They're not always submitting them first either though. Users like MakiMaki and MrBabyMan (Maki and Andy are both great guys btw) often resubmit other users stories to get them frontpaged.

Not saying thats a bad thing either, because I believe that good content should have the best possible chance of getting noticed - it's just the Recommendation Engine has widened the gap recently between the top users and the large majority of the site.

Re: Recommended Flaw: 31% of Digg Homepage submitted by 10 Users

#12
post #5

This isn't all that surprising to me. I would guess that there a few groups of users, with approximate proportions: Lurkers: 70% Diggers: 20% Submitters: 10% Regular Submitters: .. is there anyone from Digg here that can confirm this? :)

I dont know the specific numbers - but I guess if you looked at a site like socialblade.com you could probably guesstimate the submitters/regular submitters number.

Re: Recommended Flaw: 31% of Digg Homepage submitted by 10 Users

#13
post #5

This isn't all that surprising to me. I would guess that there a few groups of users, with approximate proportions: Lurkers: 70% Diggers: 20% Submitters: 10% Regular Submitters: .. is there anyone from Digg here that can confirm this? :)

You could probably get this from the digg api, lurkers coming from various traffic figures out there. I'd guess the proportion of lurkers is actually a little higher than that.

Re: Recommended Flaw: 31% of Digg Homepage submitted by 10 Users

#14
post #11
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It doesn't seem strange to me. The top submitters aren't dictating the stories. They're just submitting them first. And it doesn't seem at all unlikely that a few dedicated users could be the first to find a large fraction of the stories that ultimately became popular.

They're not always submitting them first either though. Users like MakiMaki and MrBabyMan (Maki and Andy are both great guys btw) often resubmit other users stories to get them frontpaged. Not saying thats a bad thing either, because I believe that good content should have the best possible chance of getting noticed - it's just the Recommendation Engine has widened the gap recently between the top users and the large…

Hmm. Ok, I believe the number could be partially due to brokenness. Digg made a big design mistake initially in copying Slashdot too literally, and having stories that make the frontpage start at the top and get pushed down. That causes all sorts of problems. Having stories bubble up from the bottom is much more robust. But even if they did that I bet the percentage of frontpage stories from the top 10 users would surprise most people.

Edit: Steve Huffman just reported the number for Reddit, and it's a lot lower than Digg's: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=238290

Re: Recommended Flaw: 31% of Digg Homepage submitted by 10 Users

#15
post #2

On the scale of bitching about digg (which I'm known to do :-)) this one doesn't rank. Given the various power laws out there, I'd say that it's actually pretty diverse. The people at the top, for whatever reason, work very hard to get there.

"The people at the top, for whatever reason, work very hard to get there."

And what do they get in return?

Re: Recommended Flaw: 31% of Digg Homepage submitted by 10 Users

#17
post #4

It looks like the number on News.YC is about 26%. > (let bys (map [_ 'by] (beststories nil 1000)) (/ (apply + (map cadr (firstn 10 (sort (compare > cadr) (dedup (map [list _ (count _ bys)] bys)))))) 1000)) .258 This is the fraction of the 1000 top-scoring stories in the past month or so ( http://news.ycombinator.com/best ) submitted by the top 10 submitters. Who incidentally are: nickb 77 edw519 34 markbao 26 bdfh42…

To me the percentage itself isn't surprising but the ratio

    percent of stories on homepage by top 10 
    --------------------------------------------
    percent of stories submitted total by top 10
might be interesting, especially compared with

   percent of stories on homepage by non-top n
   -----------------------------------------------
   percent of stories submitted total by non-top n
It would reveal if top submitters are just submitting more stories, or if they're submitting better stories.

Re: Recommended Flaw: 31% of Digg Homepage submitted by 10 Users

#18
post #16

Over the last week, 6% of the top stories were submitted by top-10 users on reddit.

What are "top" stories? My front page shows 100 stories on reddit -- the default is higher than Digg right?

I do trust that Reddit does have a more robust top-user base, but I'm curious about the context.

Re: Recommended Flaw: 31% of Digg Homepage submitted by 10 Users

#19
post #14
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're not always submitting them first either though. Users like MakiMaki and MrBabyMan (Maki and Andy are both great guys btw) often resubmit other users stories to get them frontpaged. Not saying thats a bad thing either, because I believe that good content should have the best possible chance of getting noticed - it's just the Recommendation Engine has widened the gap recently between the top users and the large…

Hmm. Ok, I believe the number could be partially due to brokenness. Digg made a big design mistake initially in copying Slashdot too literally, and having stories that make the frontpage start at the top and get pushed down. That causes all sorts of problems. Having stories bubble up from the bottom is much more robust. But even if they did that I bet the percentage of frontpage stories from the top 10 users would su…

Agreed. I personally think its a great thing that there are a core set of users that keep a site interesting and fresh.

I failed to mention these on accident, but here are a couple more stats to give a little more insight into how the update has affected things.

Pre Recommendation Engine, the top 10 only accounted for between 12-17% of stories on Digg's frontpage, the #1 digger Pre-RE (MrBabyMan) now barely registers post update (he was tied for 11th at the time of the article).

Re: Recommended Flaw: 31% of Digg Homepage submitted by 10 Users

#20
post #16

Over the last week, 6% of the top stories were submitted by top-10 users on reddit.

What are "top" stories? My front page shows 100 stories on reddit -- the default is higher than Digg right? I do trust that Reddit does have a more robust top-user base, but I'm curious about the context.

A "top" link is a link that has been the hottest link on all of reddit at some point.

There isn't really an analogous concept on Digg since there is no notion of hottness and links don't rise and fall. Links just appear at the top of the front page at some point.

Post reply on HN